Meischel Tina, Fritzlar Svenja, Villalón-Letelier Fernando, Smith Jeffrey M, Brooks Andrew G, Reading Patrick C, Londrigan Sarah L
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, 792 Elizabeth St., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, 792 Elizabeth St., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Pathogens. 2023 Mar 27;12(4):519. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12040519.
Ectopic protein overexpression in immortalised cell lines is a commonly used method to screen host factors for their antiviral activity against different viruses. However, the question remains as to what extent such artificial protein overexpression recapitulates endogenous protein function. Previously, we used a doxycycline-inducible overexpression system, in conjunction with approaches to modulate the expression of endogenous protein, to demonstrate the antiviral activity of IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3 against influenza A virus (IAV) but not parainfluenza virus-3 (PIV-3) in A549 cells. We now show that constitutive overexpression of the same IFITM constructs in A549 cells led to a significant restriction of PIV-3 infection by all three IFITM proteins. Variable IFITM mRNA and protein expression levels were detected in A549 cells with constitutive versus inducible overexpression of each IFITM. Our findings show that overexpression approaches can lead to levels of IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3 that significantly exceed those achieved through interferon stimulation of endogenous protein. We propose that exceedingly high levels of overexpressed IFITMs may not accurately reflect the true function of endogenous protein, thus contributing to discrepancies when attributing the antiviral activity of individual IFITM proteins against different viruses. Our findings clearly highlight the caveats associated with overexpression approaches used to screen cellular host proteins for antiviral activity.
在永生化细胞系中异位蛋白过表达是一种常用的方法,用于筛选宿主因子针对不同病毒的抗病毒活性。然而,这种人工蛋白过表达在多大程度上能够重现内源性蛋白功能仍是一个问题。此前,我们使用了强力霉素诱导的过表达系统,并结合调节内源性蛋白表达的方法,来证明IFITM1、IFITM2和IFITM3在A549细胞中对甲型流感病毒(IAV)具有抗病毒活性,但对副流感病毒3型(PIV - 3)没有活性。我们现在表明,在A549细胞中组成型过表达相同的IFITM构建体导致这三种IFITM蛋白对PIV - 3感染均有显著抑制作用。在组成型与诱导型过表达每种IFITM的A549细胞中检测到了不同的IFITM mRNA和蛋白表达水平。我们的研究结果表明,过表达方法可导致IFITM1、IFITM2和IFITM3的水平显著超过通过内源性蛋白的干扰素刺激所达到的水平。我们提出,过高水平的过表达IFITM可能无法准确反映内源性蛋白的真实功能,从而在归因单个IFITM蛋白针对不同病毒的抗病毒活性时导致差异。我们的研究结果清楚地突出了与用于筛选细胞宿主蛋白抗病毒活性的过表达方法相关的注意事项。