Kim Dong-Wan, Cho Giyoun, Kim Hyejin, Lee Gyeongmin, Lim Tae-Gwan, Kwak Ho-Young, Park Jong-Hyeon, Park Sung-Han
Center for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Research, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, 177 Hyeoksin 8-ro, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gimcheon-si 39660, Republic of Korea.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 7;11(4):815. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040815.
Following the worst outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), a highly contagious disease in cloven-hoofed animals caused by the FMD virus, from November 2010-April 2011, the Korean government enforced a mandatory vaccination policy. A bivalent (FMD type O and A; O + A) vaccine has been recently implemented. Although the FMD outbreak was suppressed by vaccination, the intramuscular (IM) injection presents side effects. Therefore, improving FMD vaccine quality is necessary. Here, we investigated the side effects and immune efficacy of the O + A bivalent vaccine using two different routes of administration: intradermal (ID) and IM. To compare the immune efficacy of the two inoculation routes, virus neutralization titers and structural protein (antigen) levels were measured. The protective efficacy of ID vaccines was confirmed using two viruses (FMDV O/AS/SKR/2019 and A/GP/SKR/2018) isolated in the Republic of Korea. Serological analysis revealed that both animals administered by ID and IM injections exhibited equal immune efficacy. A virus challenge test in the target animal (swine) revealed no (or extremely low) clinical symptoms. Swine in the ID injected group exhibited no side effects. In conclusion, we suggest that the ID route of vaccination is an effective alternative to the existing IM route, which is associated with more frequent side effects.
在2010年11月至2011年4月发生口蹄疫(FMD)最严重疫情后,韩国政府实施了强制疫苗接种政策。口蹄疫是一种由口蹄疫病毒引起的偶蹄动物高度传染性疾病。最近已实施一种二价(O型和A型口蹄疫;O+A)疫苗。尽管通过接种疫苗抑制了口蹄疫疫情,但肌肉注射存在副作用。因此,提高口蹄疫疫苗质量很有必要。在此,我们研究了使用两种不同给药途径(皮内注射和肌肉注射)的O+A二价疫苗的副作用和免疫效果。为比较两种接种途径的免疫效果,测量了病毒中和滴度和结构蛋白(抗原)水平。使用在大韩民国分离的两种病毒(FMDV O/AS/SKR/2019和A/GP/SKR/2018)确认了皮内注射疫苗的保护效果。血清学分析表明,皮内注射和肌肉注射的动物均表现出相同的免疫效果。在目标动物(猪)中进行的病毒攻毒试验未发现(或极低)临床症状。皮内注射组的猪未出现副作用。总之,我们建议皮内接种途径是现有肌肉注射途径的有效替代方法,后者副作用更频繁。