Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Neuroimage Clin. 2023;38:103412. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103412. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging white matter tractography, an increasingly popular preoperative planning modality used for pre-surgical planning in brain tumor patients, is employed with the goal of maximizing tumor resection while sparing postoperative neurological function. Clinical translation of white matter tractography has been limited by several shortcomings of standard diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), including poor modeling of fibers crossing through regions of peritumoral edema and low spatial resolution for typical clinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) sequences. Track density imaging (TDI) is a post-tractography technique that uses the number of tractography streamlines and their long-range continuity to map the white matter connections of the brain with enhanced image resolution relative to the acquired dMRI data, potentially offering improved white matter visualization in patients with brain tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of TDI-based white matter maps in a neurosurgical planning context compared to the current clinical standard of DTI-based white matter maps.
Fourteen consecutive brain tumor patients from a single institution were retrospectively selected for the study. Each patient underwent 3-Tesla dMRI scanning with 30 gradient directions and a b-value of 1000 s/mm. For each patient, two directionally encoded color (DEC) maps were produced as follows. DTI-based DEC-fractional anisotropy maps (DEC-FA) were generated on the scanner, while DEC-track density images (DEC-TDI) were generated using constrained spherical deconvolution based tractography. The potential clinical utility of each map was assessed by five practicing neurosurgeons, who rated the maps according to four clinical utility statements regarding different clinical aspects of pre-surgical planning. The neurosurgeons rated each map according to their agreement with four clinical utility statements regarding if the map 1 identified clinically relevant tracts, (2) helped establish a goal resection margin, (3) influenced a planned surgical route, and (4) was useful overall. Cumulative link mixed effect modeling and analysis of variance were performed to test the primary effect of map type (DEC-TDI vs. DEC-FA) on rater score. Pairwise comparisons using estimated marginal means were then calculated to determine the magnitude and directionality of differences in rater scores by map type.
A majority of rater responses agreed with the four clinical utility statements, indicating that neurosurgeons found both DEC maps to be useful. Across all four investigated clinical utility statements, the DEC map type significantly influenced rater score. Rater scores were significantly higher for DEC-TDI maps compared to DEC-FA maps. The largest effect size in rater scores in favor of DEC-TDI maps was observed for clinical utility statement 2, which assessed establishing a goal resection margin.
We observed a significant neurosurgeon preference for DEC-TDI maps, indicating their potential utility for neurosurgical planning.
弥散磁共振成像白质束追踪术,一种越来越流行的术前规划方式,用于脑肿瘤患者的术前规划,其目的是最大限度地切除肿瘤,同时保留术后神经功能。标准弥散张量成像(DTI)的一些局限性限制了白质束追踪术的临床转化,包括对肿瘤周围水肿区域中纤维交叉的建模不佳和典型临床弥散 MRI(dMRI)序列的空间分辨率低。轨迹密度成像(TDI)是一种基于后束追踪的技术,它使用束追踪流线的数量及其长程连续性来映射大脑的白质连接,与所获得的 dMRI 数据相比具有增强的图像分辨率,这可能为脑肿瘤患者提供更好的白质可视化效果。本研究的目的是评估基于 TDI 的白质图在神经外科规划中的效用,与基于 DTI 的白质图的当前临床标准相比。
从单个机构回顾性选择了 14 名连续的脑肿瘤患者进行研究。每位患者均接受了 3T 弥散 MRI 扫描,有 30 个梯度方向和 1000 s/mm 的 b 值。为每位患者生成了两种方向编码彩色(DEC)图,如下所示。基于 DTI 的 DEC-各向异性分数图(DEC-FA)在扫描仪上生成,而基于约束球解卷积的 DEC-轨迹密度图(DEC-TDI)则基于约束球解卷积生成。五位神经外科医生根据四项与术前规划不同临床方面相关的临床效用陈述评估了每个图谱的潜在临床效用。神经外科医生根据四个临床效用陈述对每个图谱进行评分,这些陈述涉及 1)是否确定了临床相关束,2)是否有助于建立目标切除边界,3)是否影响了计划的手术路径,以及 4)总体是否有用。采用累积链接混合效应模型和方差分析来检验图谱类型(DEC-TDI 与 DEC-FA)对评分者评分的主要影响。然后使用估计边缘均值进行成对比较,以确定图谱类型差异的大小和方向。
大多数评分者的回答与四项临床效用陈述一致,表明神经外科医生认为这两种 DEC 图谱均有用。在所有四项调查的临床效用陈述中,DEC 图谱类型均显著影响评分者评分。与 DEC-FA 图谱相比,DEC-TDI 图谱的评分显著更高。在有利于 DEC-TDI 图谱的评分者评分中,最大的效应量出现在评估建立目标切除边界的临床效用陈述 2 中。
我们观察到评分者对 DEC-TDI 图谱有明显的偏好,这表明它们在神经外科规划中有潜在的用途。