Suppr超能文献

改良 Ashworth 量表在脑卒中后 13 个肌肉群中的可靠性。

Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale After Stroke for 13 Muscle Groups.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation of Patients After Stroke, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Research and Development Unit, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct;104(10):1606-1611. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of the protocol for administration of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for all commonly affected muscle groups after stroke.

DESIGN

A repeated-measures design was used in administration of MAS for 13 muscle groups on 2 assessment days. Intrarater reliability and interrater reliability (between 3 raters) was assessed.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

30 patients, 1-19 months after stroke (age 55.1±13.5 years; N=30).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Intra- and interrater reliability of the muscle tone assessment protocol with MAS for 7 upper and 6 lower limb muscle groups compiled from previous studies; 1 modified and 4 originally described. The weighted kappa was calculated.

RESULTS

The most and the least frequently assigned MAS grades were 0 and 4, respectively. Agreement was the highest for grade 0 (49% within raters, 32% between raters). Intrarater reliability was good to excellent for upper limb (κ=0.71-0.94) and moderate to excellent for lower limb (κ=0.55-0.97) muscles. Interrater reliability was poor to good for upper limb (κ=0.25-0.66) and moderate for lower limb (κ=0.41-0.54) muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

The intrarater reliability of MAS was moderate for the hip flexors. The reliability results for the other 4 muscles studied anew after stroke were similar to the predetermined ones. The better intrarater reliability results confirmed previous findings. Because of the low interrater reliability, caution is needed in interpreting the results when reassessment is not possible by the same examiner. A well-described protocol for administering the MAS may lead to its standardization.

摘要

目的

评估改良 Ashworth 量表(MAS)用于评估脑卒中后所有常见受累肌肉群的可靠性。

设计

在 2 天的评估中,对 MAS 进行 13 个肌肉群的重复测量设计。评估了内部一致性和外部一致性(3 位评估者之间)。

地点

住院康复。

参与者

30 例脑卒中后 1-19 个月的患者(年龄 55.1±13.5 岁;N=30)。

干预

不适用。

主要观察指标

从先前的研究中汇编的 MAS 用于 7 个上肢和 6 个下肢肌肉群的肌肉张力评估方案的内部和外部一致性;1 个修改和 4 个新描述的。计算了加权 Kappa。

结果

MAS 分级中最常和最不常分配的等级分别为 0 级和 4 级。对于 0 级,评定者之间的一致性最高(49%,评定者内一致性为 32%)。上肢的内部一致性良好至优秀(κ=0.71-0.94),下肢的中等至优秀(κ=0.55-0.97)。上肢的外部一致性差至中等(κ=0.25-0.66),下肢的中等(κ=0.41-0.54)。

结论

MAS 对髋关节屈肌的内部一致性为中等。脑卒中后新研究的其他 4 个肌肉的可靠性结果与预定结果相似。更好的内部一致性结果证实了先前的发现。由于外部一致性较低,当同一评估者无法重新评估时,在解释结果时需要谨慎。 MAS 管理的描述良好的方案可能会导致其标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验