• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon for Acute Coronary Syndrome.药物涂层球囊治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效
Cardiol Res Pract. 2023 Apr 20;2023:4594818. doi: 10.1155/2023/4594818. eCollection 2023.
2
Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.药物涂层球囊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在多支冠状动脉疾病患者中的临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb 13;16(3):292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.049. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
[Efficacy comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-coated balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients with de novo coronary lesions].药物涂层球囊血管成形术或药物洗脱支架置入术对急性心肌梗死合并初发冠状动脉病变患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 24;48(7):600-607. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200327-00254.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Prespecified Analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的安全性和疗效:BASKET-SMALL 2 的预先设定分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011325. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Long-term outcomes of drug-coated balloons in patients with diffuse coronary lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗弥漫性冠状动脉病变患者的长期预后
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 23;9:935263. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.935263. eCollection 2022.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes and Vulnerable Plaque.药物涂层球囊治疗急性冠状动脉综合征伴易损斑块患者的安全性和疗效。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221130063. doi: 10.1177/10760296221130063.
7
Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与第二代药物洗脱支架置入术治疗药物洗脱支架植入术后支架内再狭窄的比较。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1405-11. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
Safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy in a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus-coated balloon: Post hoc analysis from the prospective EASTBOURNE registry.西罗莫司涂层球囊治疗的大量患者中单一抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性:来自前瞻性伊斯特本注册研究的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 May;74:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
9
Real-life experience of a stent-less revascularization strategy using a combination of excimer laser and drug-coated balloon for patients with acute coronary syndrome.使用准分子激光和药物涂层球囊联合的无支架血运重建策略治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的真实世界经验。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):284-292. doi: 10.1111/joic.12495. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
10
Drug-coated balloon-based versus drug-eluting stent-only revascularization in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架单独血运重建治疗糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的比较。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 May 20;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01853-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-coated balloon-only strategy in de novo lesions versus in-stent restenosis for the treatment of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.药物涂层球囊单药策略用于初发病变与支架内再狭窄治疗非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043357.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物涂层球囊治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 21;12(1):6552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10124-z.
2
A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Midterm Outcomes Between Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者中期结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Int Heart J. 2022 Mar 30;63(2):217-225. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-576. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Efficacy of the hemostatic device VasoSTAT and the study of hemostatic factor.止血装置 VasoSTAT 的疗效和止血因子的研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 1;11(1):21343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00892-5.
5
Drug coated balloons for coronary artery bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and focused meta-analysis.药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉分叉病变:系统评价和聚焦荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0251986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251986. eCollection 2021.
6
10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者采用依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架 10 年随访结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1165-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.059.
7
Optical coherence tomography analysis of late lumen enlargement after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for de-novo coronary artery disease.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗新发冠状动脉疾病后晚期管腔扩大的光学相干断层成像分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):E35-E42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29435. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
Application of the Modified High Bleeding Risk Criteria for Japanese Patients in an All-Comers Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3.改良的日本患者高出血风险标准在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗所有患者登记研究中的应用 - 来自 CREDO-Kyoto 登记研究队列-3。
Circ J. 2021 May 25;85(6):769-781. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0836. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.东亚悖论:心血管疾病患者当前抗栓策略面临挑战的最新立场声明。
Thromb Haemost. 2021 Apr;121(4):422-432. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718729. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Possible mechanism of late lumen enlargement after treatment for de novo coronary lesions with drug-coated balloon.药物涂层球囊治疗初发冠状动脉病变后晚期管腔扩大的可能机制。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;321:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

药物涂层球囊治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

作者信息

Naganawa Hirokazu, Ito Akira, Saiki Shinrou, Nishi Daisuke, Takamatsu Shinichi, Ito Yoshihisa, Suzuki Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Toyokawa City Hospital, Toyokawa, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiol Res Pract. 2023 Apr 20;2023:4594818. doi: 10.1155/2023/4594818. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/4594818
PMID:37122873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10139813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention using a drug-eluting stent (DES) is a common therapeutic option for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, stent-associated complications, such as bleeding associated with dual antiplatelet therapy, in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, and neoatherosclerosis, remain. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are expected to reduce stent-associated complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DCB therapy and compare it with that of DES therapy in patients with ACS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we examined all patients with ACS treated with DCB or DES between July 2014 and November 2020. Patients with left main trunk lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at one year.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy-two patients were treated with DES, and 83 patients were treated with DCB. MACE occurred in 10 (12.0%) patients in the DCB group and in 50 (13.4%) patients in the DES group (=0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

DCB is a valuable and effective therapy for patients with ACS. Moreover, DCB may become an alternative therapy for DES in patients with ACS.

摘要

背景

使用药物洗脱支架(DES)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的常见治疗选择。然而,与支架相关的并发症,如双联抗血小板治疗相关的出血、支架内再狭窄、支架血栓形成和新生动脉粥样硬化,仍然存在。药物涂层球囊(DCB)有望减少与支架相关的并发症。本研究旨在评估DCB治疗的疗效,并将其与ACS患者的DES治疗疗效进行比较。

材料与方法

在这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,我们检查了2014年7月至2020年11月期间接受DCB或DES治疗的所有ACS患者。排除左主干病变患者。主要结局是1年时的主要不良心血管事件(MACE:心源性死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建)复合终点。

结果

372例患者接受了DES治疗,83例患者接受了DCB治疗。DCB组有10例(12.0%)患者发生MACE,DES组有50例(13.4%)患者发生MACE(P=0.73)。

结论

DCB是ACS患者一种有价值且有效的治疗方法。此外,DCB可能成为ACS患者DES的替代治疗方法。