Lou Wei, Chen Ziang, Huang Yang, Jin Haiying
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 19;2023:4032011. doi: 10.1155/2023/4032011. eCollection 2023.
To evaluate refractive outcomes, intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, and IOL position following a novel conjunctiva-sparing transscleral fixation technique.
Forty-one eyes of 40 patients managed with a flapless transscleral-sutured technique were included. Preoperative and postoperative refractive errors (spherical equivalents, SE) were compared. IOL position was assessed on the Scheimpflug images. IOL power was calculated by SRK/T, Holladay 1, and Hoffer Q formulas.
The mean age was 57.39 ± 14.83 years (range: 26 to 79 years), and the mean follow-up was 7.46 ± 6.42 months (range: 1 to 24 months). Surgical indications were aphakia ( = 14), subluxated lenses ( = 3), and IOL dislocation ( = 24). The SE was 4.50 ± 6.38 diopter (D) (range: -3.75 to 13.75 D) preoperatively and -1.68 ± 1.57 D (range: -5.50 to 1.13 D) postoperatively ( < 0.001). The mean tilt angle and decentration were 2.90° ± 1.93° (range: 0.39° to 9.10°) and 0.23 ± 0.19 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.94 mm) vertically, and 1.75° ± 1.41° (range: 0.24° to 7.65°) and 0.18 ± 0.19 mm (range: 0.02 to 1.06 mm) horizontally, which were clinically insignificant. All three IOL formulas produced myopic errors (range: -0.29 to -0.50 D). The SRK/T had the lowest median absolute error (0.55 D), followed by the Holladay 1 (0.70 D) and the Hoffer Q (0.74 D). The three formulas had the same percentage of prediction errors (PEs) within ±0.5 D (43.48%), while the Hoffer Q had the highest percentage of PEs within ±1.0 D (82.61%).
The present technique can serve as an alternative approach for transscleral IOL fixation and refractive correction in eyes with compromised capsular support, ensuring the stability of IOLs and reasonable IOL power calculation accuracy.
评估一种新型保留结膜的经巩膜固定技术后的屈光结果、人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算及IOL位置。
纳入40例患者的41只眼,采用无瓣经巩膜缝合技术进行治疗。比较术前和术后的屈光不正(球镜等效度,SE)。在Scheimpflug图像上评估IOL位置。通过SRK/T、Holladay 1和Hoffer Q公式计算IOL度数。
平均年龄为57.39±14.83岁(范围:26至79岁),平均随访时间为7.46±6.42个月(范围:1至24个月)。手术适应证为无晶状体眼(n = 14)、晶状体半脱位(n = 3)和IOL脱位(n = 24)。术前SE为4.50±6.38屈光度(D)(范围:-3.75至13.75 D),术后为-1.68±1.57 D(范围:-5.50至1.13 D)(P < 0.001)。平均倾斜角度和偏心度在垂直方向分别为2.90°±1.93°(范围:0.39°至9.10°)和0.23±0.19 mm(范围:0.02至0.94 mm),在水平方向分别为1.75°±1.41°(范围:0.24°至7.65°)和0.18±0.19 mm(范围:0.02至1.06 mm),在临床上无显著意义。所有三种IOL公式均产生近视误差(范围:-0.29至-0.50 D)。SRK/T的中位绝对误差最低(0.55 D),其次是Holladay 1(0.70 D)和Hoffer Q(0.74 D)。三种公式在±0.5 D内的预测误差(PEs)百分比相同(43.48%),而Hoffer Q在±1.0 D内的PEs百分比最高(82.61%)。
本技术可作为囊袋支持受损眼经巩膜IOL固定和屈光矫正的替代方法,确保IOL的稳定性和合理的IOL度数计算准确性。