Department of Chemistry, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, South Africa.
Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Roodepoort, South Africa.
Environ Technol. 2024 Jun;45(16):3118-3128. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2023.2209741. Epub 2023 May 8.
The extent of removal of pharmaceuticals by African-based wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is relatively unknown with various studies observing high concentrations in effluents. This is mainly due to WWTPs still utilising the traditional treatment methods which are known to be less effective. In this study, 15 selected antibiotics (amoxicillin, ampicillin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, gentamicin, metronidazole, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, penicillin, sulfamethoxazole, sulfapyridine, tetracycline and trimethoprim) were monitored in wastewater as it goes through sedimentation (primary and secondary), aeration and chlorination stages of a WWTP. Analytical method involved solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatographic determination. Removal efficiencies during sedimentation were generally positive with doxycycline achieving 80-95.8%, while negative removal efficiencies were observed for penicillin V (-46.4 to -17.1%) and trimethoprim (-26.2 to -18.9%). The aeration and agitation stage resulted in concentration enhancement for several antibiotics with seven of them ranging between -273 and -15.5%. This stage was responsible for the relatively low overall removal efficiencies in which only 4 antibiotics (doxycycline, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin) experienced overall removal efficiencies above 50%. The recorded effluent concentrations ranging between 0.0130 and 0.383 ng/mL were translated to low potential for development of antibiotic resistance genes in the receiving environments while ecotoxicity risk was high for only amoxicillin, ampicillin and sulfapyridine. The study has provided an overview of the performance of common wastewater treatment processes in South Africa and hopes that more monitoring and environmental risk data can be made available towards drafting of antibiotic priority lists that cater for Africa.
在非洲的废水处理厂(WWTP)中,药物的去除程度相对未知,因为各种研究都观察到废水中的高浓度。这主要是由于 WWTP 仍在使用传统的处理方法,这些方法的效果较差。在这项研究中,在废水经过 WWTP 的沉淀(一级和二级)、曝气和氯化阶段时,监测了 15 种选定的抗生素(阿莫西林、氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、环丙沙星、强力霉素、红霉素、庆大霉素、甲硝唑、诺氟沙星、氧氟沙星、青霉素、磺胺甲恶唑、磺胺嘧啶、四环素和甲氧苄啶)。分析方法涉及固相萃取,然后进行液相色谱测定。沉淀过程中的去除效率通常为正,强力霉素的去除效率达到 80-95.8%,而青霉素 V(-46.4 至-17.1%)和甲氧苄啶(-26.2 至-18.9%)的去除效率为负。曝气和搅拌阶段导致几种抗生素的浓度增强,其中七种抗生素的浓度在-273 至-15.5%之间。该阶段是导致整体去除效率较低的原因,只有 4 种抗生素(强力霉素、四环素、环丙沙星和红霉素)的整体去除效率超过 50%。记录的废水浓度在 0.0130 至 0.383ng/mL 之间,表明在接受环境中产生抗生素耐药基因的潜力较低,而仅阿莫西林、氨苄西林和磺胺嘧啶对生态毒性风险较高。该研究概述了南非常见废水处理工艺的性能,并希望能提供更多的监测和环境风险数据,为制定适合非洲的抗生素优先清单提供依据。