Suppr超能文献

神经标准判定死亡情况下的潜在药物学混杂因素:叙述性综述。

Potential pharmacological confounders in the setting of death determined by neurologic criteria: a narrative review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):713-723. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02415-4. Epub 2023 May 2.

Abstract

Guidelines for the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC) require an absence of confounding factors if clinical examination alone is to be used. Drugs that depress the central nervous system suppress neurologic responses and spontaneous breathing and must be excluded or reversed prior to proceeding. If these confounding factors cannot be eliminated, ancillary testing is required. These drugs may be present after being administered as part of the treatment of critically ill patients. While measurement of serum drug concentrations can help guide the timing of assessments for DNC, they are not always available or feasible. In this article, we review sedative and opioid drugs that may confound DNC, along with pharmacokinetic factors that govern the duration of drug action. Pharmacokinetic parameters including a context-sensitive half-life of sedatives and opioids are highly variable in critically ill patients because of the multitude of clinical variables and conditions that can affect drug distribution and clearance. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors that influence the distribution and clearance of these drugs are discussed including end organ function, age, obesity, hyperdynamic states, augmented renal clearance, fluid balance, hypothermia, and the role of prolonged drug infusions in critically ill patients. In these contexts, it is often difficult to predict how long after drug discontinuation the confounding effects will take to dissipate. We propose a conservative framework for evaluating when or if DNC can be determined by clinical criteria alone. When pharmacologic confounders cannot be reversed, or doing so is not feasible, ancillary testing to confirm the absence of brain blood flow should be obtained.

摘要

神经学标准判定死亡指南(DNC)要求,如果仅进行临床检查,则必须排除或逆转可能影响结果的混杂因素。抑制中枢神经系统的药物会抑制神经反应和自主呼吸,必须在进行检查前将其排除或逆转。如果无法消除这些混杂因素,则需要进行辅助测试。这些药物可能在作为重症患者治疗的一部分而被给予后仍然存在。虽然血清药物浓度的测量有助于指导 DNC 评估的时间,但它们并非总是可用或可行。在本文中,我们回顾了可能影响 DNC 的镇静剂和阿片类药物,以及控制药物作用持续时间的药代动力学因素。由于多种临床变量和条件可能影响药物分布和清除,因此重症患者的镇静剂和阿片类药物的药代动力学参数,包括敏感性半衰期,变化非常大。讨论了影响这些药物分布和清除的患者、疾病和治疗相关因素,包括终末器官功能、年龄、肥胖、高动力状态、增强的肾清除率、液体平衡、低温以及延长药物输注在重症患者中的作用。在这些情况下,很难预测停药后多久混杂效应会消散。我们提出了一个评估何时或是否可以仅通过临床标准来确定 DNC 的保守框架。当无法逆转或不可行时,应获得辅助测试以确认是否存在脑血流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c345/10202973/3eeb24a5beec/12630_2023_2415_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验