方案：何时以及如何复制系统评价。
PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews.
作者信息
Karunananthan Sathya, Maxwell Lara J, Welch Vivian, Petkovic Jennifer, Pardo Jordi Pardo, Rader Tamara, Avey Marc T, Baptiste-Ngobi John, Batista Ricardo, Curran Janet A, Ghogomu Elizabeth Tanjong, Graham Ian D, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Ioannidis John Pa, Jordan Zoe, Jull Janet, Lyddiatt Anne, Moher David, Petticrew Mark, Pottie Kevin, Rada Gabriel, Shamseer Larissa, Shea Beverley, Siontis Konstantinos C, Tschirhart Naomi, Vachon Brigitte, Wells George A, White Howard, Tugwell Peter
机构信息
Clinical Epidemiology Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada.
Cochrane Musculoskeletal University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
出版信息
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;16(2):e1087. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1087. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Abstract
This is a protocol for a co-registered Cochrane and Campbell Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: To identify, describe and assess methods for: when to replicate a systematic review; how to replicate a systematic review.
摘要
这是一项Cochrane系统评价与坎贝尔协作网联合注册的综述方案（方法学）。目标如下：识别、描述和评估关于以下方面的方法：何时复制系统评价；如何复制系统评价。
相似文献
1
PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;16(2):e1087. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1087. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
PROTOCOL: Assessment of publication time in Campbell systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 10;19(1):e1303. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1303. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study.
Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 2;7(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0778-6.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
6
Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Nov 7;17(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7.
8
Effectiveness of Communication Strategies in the Management of Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Pain Res. 2023 Jun 5;16:1907-1913. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S401685. eCollection 2023.
9
Dissemination of knowledge from Cochrane Public Health reviews: a bibliographic study.
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 3;12(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02272-8.
10
PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 11;18(2):e1242. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1242. eCollection 2022 Jun.
引用本文的文献
1
Add-on effects of total glucosides of paeony on conventional therapies for psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1527288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1527288. eCollection 2025.
2
Building a sharable literature collection to advance the science and practice of implementation facilitation.
Front Health Serv. 2024 May 9;4:1304694. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1304694. eCollection 2024.
3
Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses.
Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;12(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02279-1.
4
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review.
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 4;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01165-5.
5
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 16;10(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0.
6
The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID-19: An analysis of PROSPERO records.
J Evid Based Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12426. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
本文引用的文献
1
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):515-517. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5066-3. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Mass deworming to improve developmental health and wellbeing of children in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jan;5(1):e40-e50. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30242-X.
3
Alcohol advertising and public health: systems perspectives versus narrow perspectives.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Mar;71(3):308-312. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207644. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
The end of the wormwars?
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 27;9(9):ED000116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000116.
5
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
6
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 15;10(12):e0144980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144980. eCollection 2015.
8
Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 23;2015(7):CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub6.
9
How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO.
BJOG. 2014 Jun;121(7):784-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12657. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies.
BMJ. 2013 Jul 19;347:f4501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4501.
Zotero 插件