University of South Australia, Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, Australia.
University of South Australia, Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT), Health Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2201514. Epub 2023 May 3.
Neurorehabilitation technologies are a novel approach to providing rehabilitation for patients with neurological conditions. There is a need to explore patient experiences. This study aimed; 1) To identify available questionnaires that assess patients' experiences with neurorehabilitation technologies, and 2) where reported, to document the psychometric properties of the identified questionnaires.
Four databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Emcare and PsycInfo). The inclusion criteria were all types of primary data collection that included neurological patients of all ages who had experienced therapy with neurorehabilitation technologies and completed questionnaires to assess these experiences.
Eighty-eight publications were included. Fifteen different questionnaires along with many self-developed scales were identified. These were categorised as; 1) self-developed tools, 2) specific questionnaire for a particular technology, and 3) generic questionnaires originally developed for a different purpose. The questionnaires were used to assess various technologies, including virtual reality, robotics, and gaming systems. Most studies did not report any psychometric properties.
Many tools have been used to evaluate patient experiences, but few were specifically developed for neurorehabilitation technologies and psychometric data was limited. A preliminary recommendation would be use of the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire to evaluate patient experience with virtual reality systems.
神经康复技术是为神经系统疾病患者提供康复的一种新方法。需要探索患者的体验。本研究旨在:1)确定可用于评估神经康复技术患者体验的现有问卷,以及 2)如果有报告,记录已确定问卷的心理测量特性。
在四个数据库中进行了检索(Medline、Embase、Emcare 和 PsycInfo)。纳入标准是所有类型的原始数据收集,包括接受神经康复技术治疗的所有年龄段的神经科患者,并完成了评估这些体验的问卷。
共纳入 88 篇出版物。确定了 15 种不同的问卷以及许多自编量表。这些问卷分为以下几类:1)自编工具,2)特定技术的特定问卷,3)最初为其他目的开发的通用问卷。这些问卷用于评估各种技术,包括虚拟现实、机器人和游戏系统。大多数研究没有报告任何心理测量特性。
已经使用了许多工具来评估患者的体验,但很少有专门为神经康复技术开发的工具,心理测量数据也有限。初步建议是使用用户满意度评估问卷来评估虚拟现实系统的患者体验。