Division of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 10, 119228, Singapore.
Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, BE-1050, Belgium.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Oct;37(5):1351-1359. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01024-2. Epub 2023 May 3.
Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important vital sign in critically ill patients and has a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic approach to IAP measurement against the gold standard intra-bladder pressure (IBP) method. We conducted a prospective observational study in an adult medical ICU of a university hospital. IAP measurements using ultrasonography by two independent operators, with different experience levels (experienced, IAP; inexperienced, IAP), were compared with the gold standard IBP method performed by a third blinded operator. For the ultrasonographic method, decremental external pressure was applied on the anterior abdominal wall using a bottle filled with decreasing volumes of water. Ultrasonography looked at peritoneal rebound upon brisk withdrawal of the external pressure. The loss of peritoneal rebound was identified as the point where IAP was equal to or above the applied external pressure. Twenty-one patients underwent 74 IAP readings (range 2-15 mmHg). The number of readings per patient was 3.5 ± 2.5, and the abdominal wall thickness was 24.6 ± 13.1 mm. Bland and Altman's analysis showed a bias (0.39 and 0.61 mmHg) and precision (1.38 and 1.51 mmHg) for the comparison of IAP and IAP and vs. IBP, respectively with small limits of agreement that were in line with the research guidelines of the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS). Our novel ultrasound-based IAP method displayed good correlation and agreement between IAP and IBP at levels up to 15 mmHg and is an excellent solution for quick decision-making in critically ill patients.
腹腔内压(IAP)升高是危重症患者的一个重要生命体征,对发病率和死亡率有负面影响。本研究旨在验证一种新的非侵入性超声测量 IAP 的方法与金标准膀胱内压(IBP)方法的相关性。我们在一家大学医院的成人内科重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。由两名具有不同经验水平的独立操作者(有经验的操作者 IAP 和无经验的操作者 IAP)使用超声测量 IAP,并与由第三位盲法操作者进行的金标准 IBP 方法进行比较。对于超声方法,使用装有递减体积水的瓶子对前腹壁施加递减的外部压力。超声检查观察到外部压力迅速撤回时腹膜的反弹。腹膜反弹的丧失被确定为 IAP 等于或高于施加的外部压力的点。21 名患者接受了 74 次 IAP 读数(范围 2-15mmHg)。每位患者的读数次数为 3.5±2.5,腹壁厚度为 24.6±13.1mm。Bland 和 Altman 分析显示,IAP 和 IAP 与 IBP 比较的偏差(0.39 和 0.61mmHg)和精度(1.38 和 1.51mmHg)较小,一致性界限符合腹部分隔综合征协会(WSACS)的研究指南。我们的新超声 IAP 方法在高达 15mmHg 的水平上显示出与 IBP 之间的良好相关性和一致性,是危重症患者快速决策的极佳解决方案。