Suppr超能文献

通过体外分析评估不同类型 JAK 抑制剂在风湿性疾病中的 JAK 同工型选择性差异。

Differences in JAK Isoform Selectivity Among Different Types of JAK Inhibitors Evaluated for Rheumatic Diseases Through In Vitro Profiling.

机构信息

Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Nov;75(11):2054-2061. doi: 10.1002/art.42547. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The selectivity of JAK inhibitors (Jakinibs) forms the basis for understanding their clinical characteristics; however, evaluation of selectivity is hampered by the lack of comprehensive head-to-head studies. Our objective was to profile in parallel Jakinibs indicated or evaluated for rheumatic diseases for their JAK and cytokine selectivity in vitro.

METHODS

We analyzed 10 Jakinibs for JAK isoform selectivity by assaying their inhibition of JAK kinase activity, binding to kinase and pseudokinase domains, and inhibition of cytokine signaling using blood samples from healthy volunteers and using isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and from healthy donors.

RESULTS

Pan-Jakinibs effectively suppressed kinase activity of 2 to 3 JAK family members, whereas isoform-targeted Jakinibs possessed varying degrees of selectivity for 1 or 2 JAK family members. In human leukocytes, Jakinibs predominantly inhibited the JAK1-dependent cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, and interferons (IFNs). In PBMCs from patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with healthy controls, inhibition of these cytokines was more pronounced, and some cell-type and STAT isoform differences were observed. Novel Jakinibs demonstrated high selectivity: the covalent Jakinib ritlecitinib showed 900- to 2,500-fold selectivity for JAK3 over other JAKs and specific suppression of IL-2-signaling, whereas the allosteric TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib inhibited IFNα signaling with high specificity. Interestingly, deucravacitinib targeted the regulatory pseudokinase domain and did not affect JAK in vitro kinase activity.

CONCLUSION

Inhibition of JAK kinase activity did not directly translate into cellular inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling. Despite differences in JAK selectivity, the cytokine inhibition profiles of currently approved Jakinibs were highly similar, with preference for JAK1-mediated cytokines. Novel types of Jakinibs showed narrow cytokine inhibition profile specific for JAK3- or TYK2-mediated signaling.

摘要

目的

JAK 抑制剂(Jakinibs)的选择性是了解其临床特征的基础;然而,由于缺乏全面的头对头研究,对选择性的评估受到了阻碍。我们的目的是平行分析已批准或正在评估用于治疗风湿性疾病的 Jakinibs,评估其在体外对 JAK 和细胞因子的选择性。

方法

我们通过检测 JAK 激酶活性、与激酶和假激酶结构域的结合以及使用健康志愿者的血液样本和来自类风湿关节炎患者和健康供体的分离外周血单核细胞(PBMCs),分析了 10 种 Jakinibs 的 JAK 同工型选择性。

结果

泛 Jakinibs 有效地抑制了 2 至 3 种 JAK 家族成员的激酶活性,而针对同工型的 Jakinibs 对 1 或 2 种 JAK 家族成员具有不同程度的选择性。在人白细胞中,Jakinibs 主要抑制 JAK1 依赖性细胞因子白细胞介素-2(IL-2)、IL-6 和干扰素(IFNs)。与健康对照组相比,在类风湿关节炎患者的 PBMCs 中,这些细胞因子的抑制更为明显,并且观察到一些细胞类型和 STAT 同工型差异。新型 Jakinibs 表现出高选择性:共价 Jakinib ritlecitinib 对 JAK3 的选择性比其他 JAK 高 900 至 2500 倍,并且特异性抑制 IL-2 信号传导,而变构 TYK2 抑制剂 deucravacitinib 则特异性抑制 IFNα 信号传导。有趣的是,deucravacitinib 靶向调节性假激酶结构域,并且不会影响 JAK 在体外激酶活性。

结论

JAK 激酶活性的抑制并未直接转化为 JAK/STAT 信号传导的细胞抑制。尽管 JAK 选择性存在差异,但目前批准的 Jakinibs 的细胞因子抑制谱非常相似,对 JAK1 介导的细胞因子有偏好。新型 Jakinibs 表现出针对 JAK3 或 TYK2 介导的信号传导的狭窄细胞因子抑制谱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验