Translational Medicine, Immunology, Cardiovascular & Neuroscience Disease Team, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Immunology Thematic Research Centers (TRC), Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1437512. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1437512. eCollection 2024.
Translational medicine provides insight into novel drugs and predicts unwanted effects. In well-characterized pathways (e.g., cytokine-Janus kinase [JAK]-signal transducers and activators of transcription [STAT]), a variety of assessments were used to estimate selectivity of effects on different potential targets (i.e., JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2 [TYK2]). Several approved drugs were characterized as selective for the JAK family. These assessments are challenged by a lack of compounds that only inhibit one JAK family member. Deucravacitinib is a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of TYK2, a kinase required for IL-12, IL-23, and Type I interferon signaling. Unlike deucravacitinib, which selectively binds to the TYK2 regulatory domain, JAK1,2,3 inhibitors target the catalytic domain, contributing to nonselective targeting of JAK1,2,3. Cytokines associated with JAK1,2,3 signaling are required for both immune and nonimmune functions. A similar laboratory abnormality profile was observed in clinical trials using JAK1,2,3 inhibitors that has not been observed with deucravacitinib. testing of JAK1,2,3 inhibitors has relied upon assays of signal transduction, such as those measuring STAT phosphorylation, for estimates of potency and selectivity. These assay systems can be effective in estimating efficacy; however, they may not provide insight into downstream outcomes of receptor signaling, which may be more relevant for evaluating safety aspects. Assay systems assessing functional outcomes from cells may yield a more useful translational evaluation. Here, deucravacitinib was assessed for potency and selectivity versus three representatives of the JAK inhibitor class (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) based on functional assays. JAK inhibitors had suppressive activity against JAK2-dependent hematopoietic colony-forming assays modeling thrombopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and myelopoiesis; however, deucravacitinib did not. Deucravacitinib had limited potency against NK cells, cytotoxic T cells, T-helper cells, and regulatory T cells activated by JAK1/JAK3-dependent common gamma chain cytokines. These data are consistent with the biologic role of JAK1,2,3 and pharmacodynamic changes in clinical laboratory abnormalities. Against TYK2-dependent cytokines, deucravacitinib selectively inhibited Type I interferon stimulation of monocytes and dendritic cells and was a more potent inhibitor than JAK inhibitors. IL-12 and IL-23 functional outputs were similarly potently inhibited by deucravacitinib. Results are consistent with deucravacitinib selectively inhibiting TYK2.
转化医学为新型药物提供了深入了解,并预测了不良影响。在特征明确的途径(例如细胞因子-Janus 激酶 [JAK]-信号转导子和转录激活子 [STAT])中,使用了各种评估方法来估计对不同潜在靶点(即 JAK1、JAK2、JAK3 和酪氨酸激酶 2 [TYK2])的作用选择性。几种已批准的药物被表征为 JAK 家族的选择性药物。这些评估受到缺乏仅抑制一种 JAK 家族成员的化合物的挑战。德卡瓦西替尼是一种新型、口服、选择性、变构 TYK2 抑制剂,是 IL-12、IL-23 和 I 型干扰素信号所必需的激酶。与选择性结合 TYK2 调节域的德卡瓦西替尼不同,JAK1、2、3 抑制剂靶向催化域,导致 JAK1、2、3 的非选择性靶向。与 JAK1、2、3 信号相关的细胞因子对于免疫和非免疫功能都是必需的。在使用 JAK1、2、3 抑制剂的临床试验中观察到了与德卡瓦西替尼不同的类似实验室异常谱。JAK1、2、3 抑制剂的测试依赖于信号转导的测定,例如那些测量 STAT 磷酸化的测定,以估计效力和选择性。这些测定系统在估计疗效方面可能是有效的;然而,它们可能无法提供对受体信号下游结果的深入了解,这对于评估安全性方面可能更为相关。评估细胞功能结果的测定系统可能会产生更有用的转化评估。在这里,根据功能性测定,德卡瓦西替尼被评估为对三种 JAK 抑制剂类别的代表性药物(托法替尼、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼)的效力和选择性。JAK 抑制剂对模拟血小板生成、红细胞生成和髓样生成的 JAK2 依赖性造血集落形成测定具有抑制活性;然而,德卡瓦西替尼没有。德卡瓦西替尼对 JAK1/JAK3 依赖性共同γ链细胞因子激活的自然杀伤细胞、细胞毒性 T 细胞、辅助性 T 细胞和调节性 T 细胞的活性有限。这些数据与 JAK1、2、3 的生物学作用以及临床实验室异常的药效学变化一致。对于 TYK2 依赖性细胞因子,德卡瓦西替尼选择性抑制 I 型干扰素对单核细胞和树突状细胞的刺激,并且比 JAK 抑制剂更有效。IL-12 和 IL-23 的功能输出也被德卡瓦西替尼同样有效地抑制。结果与德卡瓦西替尼选择性抑制 TYK2 一致。