• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝门部胆管癌:短期结局的多中心倾向评分分析。

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Intestinal Diseases Research Institute of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2023 May 3;23(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9
PMID:37138243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10157952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) has been increasingly applied in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). In this study, we intend to compare the short-term outcomes of LS versus open operation (OP) for pCCA in a multicentric practice in China.

METHODS

This real-world analysis included 645 pCCA patients receiving LS and OP at 11 participating centers in China between January 2013 and January 2019. A comparative analysis was performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in LS and OP groups, and within Bismuth subgroups. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to identify significant prognostic factors of adverse surgical outcomes and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Among 645 pCCAs, 256 received LS and 389 received OP. Reduced hepaticojejunostomy (30.89% vs 51.40%, P = 0.006), biliary plasty requirement (19.51% vs 40.16%, P = 0.001), shorter LOS (mean 14.32 vs 17.95 d, P < 0.001), and lower severe complication (CD ≥ III) (12.11% vs. 22.88%, P = 0.006) were observed in the LS group compared with the OP group. Major postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, biliary fistula, abdominal abscess, and hepatic insufficiency were similar between LS and OP (P > 0.05 for all). After PSM, the short-term outcomes of two surgical methods were similar, except for shorter LOS in LS compared with OP (mean 15.19 vs 18.48 d, P = 0.0007). A series subgroup analysis demonstrated that LS was safe and had advantages in shorting LOS.

CONCLUSION

Although the complex surgical procedures, LS generally seems to be safe and feasible for experienced surgeons.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05402618 (date of first registration: 02/06/2022).

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术(LS)已越来越多地应用于肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)。本研究旨在比较中国多中心实践中 LS 与开腹手术(OP)治疗 pCCA 的短期疗效。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在中国 11 家参与中心接受 LS 和 OP 治疗的 645 例 pCCA 患者。在 LS 和 OP 组分别进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的对比分析,并在 Bismuth 亚组内进行分析。采用单因素和多因素模型确定不良手术结局和术后住院时间(LOS)的显著预后因素。

结果

645 例 pCCA 患者中,256 例行 LS,389 例行 OP。LS 组肝肠吻合术(30.89%比 51.40%,P=0.006)、胆道成形术需求(19.51%比 40.16%,P=0.001)、LOS 更短(平均 14.32 比 17.95 d,P<0.001)和严重并发症(CD≥III 级)发生率更低(12.11%比 22.88%,P=0.006)。LS 组与 OP 组的主要术后并发症如出血、胆漏、腹腔脓肿和肝功能不全发生率相似(P>0.05)。PSM 后,两种手术方法的短期疗效相似,但 LS 组 LOS 较 OP 组更短(平均 15.19 比 18.48 d,P=0.0007)。一系列亚组分析表明,LS 安全,在缩短 LOS 方面具有优势。

结论

尽管 LS 手术复杂,但对于有经验的外科医生来说,LS 通常是安全可行的。

临床试验注册

NCT05402618(首次注册日期:2022 年 2 月 6 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/c482dd8fcc39/12885_2023_10783_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/344cc266c8f7/12885_2023_10783_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/228cf4b90bd4/12885_2023_10783_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/c482dd8fcc39/12885_2023_10783_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/344cc266c8f7/12885_2023_10783_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/228cf4b90bd4/12885_2023_10783_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d1/10157952/c482dd8fcc39/12885_2023_10783_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝门部胆管癌:短期结局的多中心倾向评分分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 3;23(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9.
2
The Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Compared with the Open Approach: A Real-World Multicentric Analysis.腹腔镜切除肝门周围胆管癌与开放手术的长期结果比较:一项真实世界的多中心分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;30(3):1366-1378. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12647-1. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Laparoscopic surgery reduced frequency of postoperative small bowel obstruction, and hospital stay compared with open surgery in a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术相比,可降低结直肠癌患者术后小肠梗阻的发生频率和住院时间:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8790-8796. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09302-x. Epub 2022 May 12.
4
Evaluation of the outcomes of biliary-enteric reconstruction in robotic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助肝门部胆管癌根治术中胆肠重建效果的评估:单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65875-8.
5
Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 3-year outcomes of a cohort study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:倾向评分匹配队列研究的 3 年结果。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;33:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on short-term and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝门部胆管癌:短期和长期结局的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3721-3731. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08686-6. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
7
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic left colectomy for radical treatment of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis in a consecutive series of 211 patients.开放、腹腔镜和机器人左半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的比较:211 例连续患者的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;20(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02796-8.
8
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness?肝门部胆管癌:我们准备好迈向微创治疗了吗?
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):423-433. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00752-3. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
9
Robotic hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a pioneer western case series.机器人肝切除术和胆重建治疗肝门部胆管癌:西方先驱性病例系列。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):999-1006. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01041-3. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
10
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 May;58(5):489-496. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2143724. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive liver surgery for perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.肝门部及肝内胆管癌的微创肝脏手术:比较研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11900-4.
2
Risk factors for postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2023.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后结局的危险因素:一项2015年至2023年的回顾性队列研究
Gland Surg. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1128-1139. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-63. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Review of the Current Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.微创治疗肝门部胆管癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结局的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2021 Apr;73(2):359-377. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01006-6. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Minimally invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 158 patients.肝门部胆管癌的微创手术:158例患者的多中心回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6612-6622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08161-8. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
3
Current Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
肝门部胆管癌的微创手术——当前文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 27;14(11):3748. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113748.
4
Is it time to define the scope of safety for robotic resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery? A propensity score matching based analysis of a single center experience.是时候界定肝门部胆管癌手术中机器人切除术的安全范围了吗?基于倾向评分匹配的单中心经验分析。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 May 31;29(2):127-139. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.25-012. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
5
Robotic surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a concise systematic review.肝门部胆管癌的机器人手术:简要系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2701-2710. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
6
Evaluation of the outcomes of biliary-enteric reconstruction in robotic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助肝门部胆管癌根治术中胆肠重建效果的评估:单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65875-8.
当前微创治疗肝门部胆管癌的进展。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Sep;24(9):2143-2149. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04639-x. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review.腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗肝门部胆管癌:一项最新的系统评价
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jan;91(1-2):42-48. doi: 10.1111/ans.15948. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness?肝门部胆管癌:我们准备好迈向微创治疗了吗?
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):423-433. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00752-3. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.STROCSS 2019 指南:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
7
Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations - a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers.单纯腹腔镜与开腹半肝切除术:批判性评估和现实期望——来自 9 个欧洲三级转诊中心的右半肝和左半肝切除术的倾向评分分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jan;27(1):3-15. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.662. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
8
The Significance of Visceral Protection in Preventing Enteroatmospheric Fistulae During Open Abdomen Treatment in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Propensity Score-matched Case-control Analysis.开腹术治疗继发性腹膜炎患者中内脏保护预防肠-腔瘘的意义:倾向评分匹配病例对照分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1182-1188. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003440.
9
Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial).加速微创结直肠癌手术后加速康复(RecoverMI 试验)的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2019 Sep;106(10):1311-1318. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11223. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A Propensity Score Analysis.细胞减灭术联合或不联合腹腔热灌注化疗治疗胃癌腹膜转移(CYTO-CHIP 研究):倾向评分分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):2028-2040. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01688. Epub 2019 May 14.