Herbst Austin, Goel Swati, Beane Abi, Brotherton B Jason, Dula Dingase, Ely E Wesley, Gordon Stephen B, Haniffa Rashan, Hedt-Gauthier Bethany, Limbani Felix, Lipnick Michael S, Lyon Samuel, Njoki Carolyne, Oduor Peter, Otieno George, Pisani Luigi, Rylance Jamie, Shrime Mark G, Uwamahoro Doris Lorette, Vanderburg Sky, Waweru-Siika Wangari, Twagirumugabe Theogene, Riviello Elisabeth
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 17;10:1148334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1148334. eCollection 2023.
Knowing the target oxygen saturation (SpO) range that results in the best outcomes for acutely hypoxemic adults is important for clinical care, training, and research in low-income and lower-middle income countries (collectively LMICs). The evidence we have for SpO targets emanates from high-income countries (HICs), and therefore may miss important contextual factors for LMIC settings. Furthermore, the evidence from HICs is mixed, amplifying the importance of specific circumstances. For this literature review and analysis, we considered SpO targets used in previous trials, international and national society guidelines, and direct trial evidence comparing outcomes using different SpO ranges (all from HICs). We also considered contextual factors, including emerging data on pulse oximetry performance in different skin pigmentation ranges, the risk of depleting oxygen resources in LMIC settings, the lack of access to arterial blood gases that necessitates consideration of the subpopulation of hypoxemic patients who are also hypercapnic, and the impact of altitude on median SpO values. This process of integrating prior study protocols, society guidelines, available evidence, and contextual factors is potentially useful for the development of other clinical guidelines for LMIC settings. We suggest that a goal SpO range of 90-94% is reasonable, using high-performing pulse oximeters. Answering context-specific research questions, such as an optimal SpO target range in LMIC contexts, is critical for advancing equity in clinical outcomes globally.
对于低收入和中低收入国家(统称为中低收入国家)的临床护理、培训和研究而言,了解能使急性低氧血症成年人获得最佳治疗效果的目标血氧饱和度(SpO)范围至关重要。我们所拥有的关于SpO目标的证据来自高收入国家,因此可能忽略了中低收入国家环境中的重要背景因素。此外,来自高收入国家的证据并不一致,这凸显了具体情况的重要性。在本次文献综述和分析中,我们考虑了先前试验中使用的SpO目标、国际和国家学会指南,以及比较不同SpO范围结局的直接试验证据(均来自高收入国家)。我们还考虑了背景因素,包括不同皮肤色素沉着范围内脉搏血氧饱和度性能的新数据、中低收入国家环境中氧气资源耗尽的风险、因无法获取动脉血气而需要考虑同时存在高碳酸血症的低氧血症患者亚群,以及海拔对SpO中位数的影响。将先前的研究方案、学会指南、现有证据和背景因素整合起来的这一过程,可能有助于制定针对中低收入国家环境的其他临床指南。我们建议,使用高性能脉搏血氧仪时,目标SpO范围设定为90 - 94%是合理的。回答特定背景下的研究问题,例如中低收入国家环境中的最佳SpO目标范围,对于在全球范围内推进临床结局的公平性至关重要。