From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School (N.I.S.), the Biostatistics Center (D.H., W.H., P.L.) and the Department of Medicine (K.O., N.R., B.T.T.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.T.), Boston, and the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield (J.S.S.) - all in Massachusetts; the Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (I.S.D.), and the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (A.A.G.) - both in Colorado; the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (R.G.B., T.J.I.); the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City - both in Utah (S.M.B., C.K.G.); the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (M.C.E.); the Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (M.N.G.); the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (C.L.H., A.K.); the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (A.E.J.); the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center, San Francisco (K.D.L.); the Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (C.D.M.); the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (P.K.P.); the Departments of Medicine (T.W.R., M.W.S.) and Emergency Medicine (W.H.S.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (D.M.Y.).
N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 9;388(6):499-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212663. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Intravenous fluids and vasopressor agents are commonly used in early resuscitation of patients with sepsis, but comparative data for prioritizing their delivery are limited.
In an unblinded superiority trial conducted at 60 U.S. centers, we randomly assigned patients to either a restrictive fluid strategy (prioritizing vasopressors and lower intravenous fluid volumes) or a liberal fluid strategy (prioritizing higher volumes of intravenous fluids before vasopressor use) for a 24-hour period. Randomization occurred within 4 hours after a patient met the criteria for sepsis-induced hypotension refractory to initial treatment with 1 to 3 liters of intravenous fluid. We hypothesized that all-cause mortality before discharge home by day 90 (primary outcome) would be lower with a restrictive fluid strategy than with a liberal fluid strategy. Safety was also assessed.
A total of 1563 patients were enrolled, with 782 assigned to the restrictive fluid group and 781 to the liberal fluid group. Resuscitation therapies that were administered during the 24-hour protocol period differed between the two groups; less intravenous fluid was administered in the restrictive fluid group than in the liberal fluid group (difference of medians, -2134 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2318 to -1949), whereas the restrictive fluid group had earlier, more prevalent, and longer duration of vasopressor use. Death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 occurred in 109 patients (14.0%) in the restrictive fluid group and in 116 patients (14.9%) in the liberal fluid group (estimated difference, -0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 2.6; P = 0.61); 5 patients in the restrictive fluid group and 4 patients in the liberal fluid group had their data censored (lost to follow-up). The number of reported serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.
Among patients with sepsis-induced hypotension, the restrictive fluid strategy that was used in this trial did not result in significantly lower (or higher) mortality before discharge home by day 90 than the liberal fluid strategy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CLOVERS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03434028.).
在脓毒症患者的早期复苏中,常使用静脉输液和血管加压药,但关于优先给予这些治疗的比较数据有限。
在 60 个美国中心进行的一项非盲效性试验中,我们将患者随机分配至限制输液策略组(优先使用血管加压药和较低剂量的静脉输液)或自由输液策略组(在使用血管加压药前优先给予较高剂量的静脉输液),持续 24 小时。随机化发生在患者满足脓毒性低血压标准后 4 小时内,且经 1 至 3 升静脉输液初始治疗后仍持续低血压。我们假设限制输液策略组的全因死亡率(主要结局)在出院前 90 天(出院时)会低于自由输液策略组。同时还评估了安全性。
共纳入 1563 例患者,其中 782 例分配至限制输液组,781 例分配至自由输液组。两组在 24 小时方案期间接受的复苏治疗不同;限制输液组的静脉输液量少于自由输液组(中位数差值,-2134 毫升;95%置信区间 [CI],-2318 至 -1949),而限制输液组更早、更普遍、且血管加压药使用时间更长。限制输液组有 109 例(14.0%)患者在出院前 90 天死于任何原因,自由输液组有 116 例(14.9%)患者(估计差值,-0.9 个百分点;95%CI,-4.4 至 2.6;P=0.61);限制输液组有 5 例患者和自由输液组有 4 例患者数据被删失(失访)。两组报告的严重不良事件数量相似。
在脓毒性低血压患者中,与自由输液策略相比,本试验中使用的限制输液策略并未显著降低(或升高)出院前 90 天的死亡率。(由美国国立心肺血液研究所资助;CLOVERS ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT03434028。)