• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区很重要:一项卫生干预措施的异质性影响

Community matters: Heterogeneous impacts of a sanitation intervention.

作者信息

Abramovsky Laura, Augsburg Britta, Lührmann Melanie, Oteiza Francisco, Rud Juan Pablo

机构信息

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), United Kingdom.

Overseas Development Institute (ODI), United Kingdom.

出版信息

World Dev. 2023 May;165:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106197.

DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106197
PMID:37138929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10008727/
Abstract

Sanitation is at the heart of public health policies in most of the developing world, where around 85% of the population still lack access to safe sanitation. We study the effectiveness of a widely adopted participatory community-level information intervention aimed at improving sanitation. Results from a randomized controlled trial, implemented at scale in rural Nigeria, reveal stark heterogeneity in impacts: the intervention has immediate, strong and lasting effects on sanitation practices in less wealthy communities, realized through increased sanitation investments. In contrast, we find no evidence of impacts among wealthier communities. This suggests that a targeted implementation of CLTS may increase its effectiveness in improving sanitation. Our findings can be replicated in other contexts, using microdata from evaluations of similar interventions.

摘要

在大多数发展中世界,环境卫生是公共卫生政策的核心,在这些地方约85%的人口仍无法获得安全的卫生设施。我们研究了一种广泛采用的旨在改善环境卫生的社区层面参与式信息干预措施的有效性。在尼日利亚农村大规模开展的一项随机对照试验结果显示,影响存在明显的异质性:该干预措施对较贫困社区的卫生习惯有直接、强烈且持久的影响,这是通过增加卫生投资实现的。相比之下,我们没有发现该干预措施对较富裕社区产生影响的证据。这表明有针对性地实施社区主导的环境卫生运动(CLTS)可能会提高其改善环境卫生的有效性。利用来自类似干预措施评估的微观数据,我们的研究结果可以在其他背景下得到复制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/94748518375e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/6b6d16be208e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/771c62caf748/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/94748518375e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/6b6d16be208e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/771c62caf748/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d1/10008727/94748518375e/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Community matters: Heterogeneous impacts of a sanitation intervention.社区很重要:一项卫生干预措施的异质性影响
World Dev. 2023 May;165:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106197.
2
Effect of a community-led sanitation intervention on child diarrhoea and child growth in rural Mali: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.社区主导的环境卫生干预对马里农村儿童腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e701-11. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00144-8.
3
How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) promote latrine construction, and can it be improved? A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Ghana.社区主导的整体环境卫生(CLTS)如何促进厕所建设,能否加以改进?加纳的一项整群随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112705. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112705. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Factors influencing community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implementation abandonment before achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status: case study of the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso.影响社区主导的全面卫生(CLTS)在实现无露天排便(ODF)状态之前被放弃的因素:布基纳法索中西部地区的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(60):125628-125645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31142-y. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
5
The Impact of Pro-Poor Sanitation Subsidies in Open Defecation-Free Communities: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Rural Ghana.《贫困导向卫生设施补贴对无露天排便社区的影响:加纳农村地区的一项随机对照试验》。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Jun;130(6):67004. doi: 10.1289/EHP10443. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
6
The true costs of participatory sanitation: Evidence from community-led total sanitation studies in Ghana and Ethiopia.参与式环境卫生的真实成本:来自加纳和埃塞俄比亚社区主导的全面环境卫生研究的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;601-602:1075-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.279. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
Comprehending practitioners' assessments of community-led total sanitation.理解社区主导的整体卫生从业者评估。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):e129-e138. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day070.
8
Can child-focused sanitation and nutrition programming improve health practices and outcomes? Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Kitui County, Kenya.以儿童为中心的环境卫生与营养项目能否改善健康行为及成果?来自肯尼亚基图伊县一项随机对照试验的证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 5;4(1):e000973. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000973. eCollection 2019.
9
Water supply, sanitation and hygiene interventions and childhood diarrhea in Kersa and Omo Nada districts of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚吉马地区克萨和奥莫纳达区的供水、环境卫生与个人卫生干预措施及儿童腹泻情况:一项比较性横断面研究
J Health Popul Nutr. 2019 Dec 13;38(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0205-1.
10
Where Does CLTS Work Best? Quantifying Predictors of CLTS Performance in Four Countries.社区导向型环境卫生促进(CLTS)在何处效果最佳?量化四个国家CLTS实施效果的预测因素。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 16;55(6):4064-4076. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05733. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention.利用机器学习在基于人群的水、环境卫生、洗手和营养干预中识别预期受益最高的亚组。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 18:2025.06.17.25329796. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.17.25329796.
2
Clear Waters, Bright Futures: Do Low-Cost Information Interventions Increase Health Preventive Behaviors.清澈水域,光明未来:低成本信息干预能否增加健康预防行为?
Health Econ. 2025 Sep;34(9):1578-1594. doi: 10.1002/hec.4977. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Effects of Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) Boosting and Household Factors on Latrine Ownership in Siaya County, Kenya.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting Open Defecation: Evidence from a Panel Survey in Rural North India, 2014-18.重新审视露天排便:来自印度北部农村地区2014 - 2018年面板调查的证据
Econ Polit Wkly. 2020 May 23;55(21):55-63.
2
Factors influencing the scale-up of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic literature review.影响中低收入国家公共卫生干预措施推广的因素:定性系统文献综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Mar 1;35(2):219-234. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz140.
3
Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India, 2005-2016.
肯尼亚锡亚县社区主导的整体环境卫生(CLTS)促进措施和家庭因素对厕所拥有率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 18;20(18):6781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186781.
4
Sanitation and marriage markets in India: Evidence from the Total Sanitation Campaign.印度的卫生设施与婚姻市场:来自全面卫生运动的证据。
J Dev Econ. 2023 Jun;163:103092. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103092.
5
Environmental health situation in Nigeria: current status and future needs.尼日利亚的环境卫生状况:现状与未来需求
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 23;7(3):e06330. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06330. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2005-2016 年印度社区主导的环境卫生运动的长期影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):523-533A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.221572. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Watersheds in Child Mortality: The Role of Effective Water and Sewerage Infrastructure, 1880 to 1920.儿童死亡率中的分水岭:1880年至1920年有效供水和排水基础设施的作用
J Polit Econ. 2019 Apr;127(2):586-638. doi: 10.1086/700766. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Scaling up sanitation: Evidence from an RCT in Indonesia.扩大卫生设施覆盖范围:来自印度尼西亚一项随机对照试验的证据。
J Dev Econ. 2019 May;138:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.12.001.
6
Community-Led Total Sanitation Moves the Needle on Ending Open Defecation in Zambia.社区主导的全面卫生行动推动赞比亚在消除露天排便方面取得进展。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):767-769. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0151.
7
Community-Led Total Sanitation: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Evidence and Its Quality.社区主导的总体卫生:证据及其质量的混合方法系统评价。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Feb 2;126(2):026001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1965.
8
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.理解与误解随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:2-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
9
Microcredit and willingness to pay for environmental quality: Evidence from a randomized-controlled trial of finance for sanitation in rural Cambodia.小额信贷与为环境质量付费的意愿:来自柬埔寨农村卫生设施融资随机对照试验的证据。
J Environ Econ Manage. 2017 Nov;86:121-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.004.
10
Are there synergies from combining hygiene and sanitation promotion campaigns: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized trial in rural Tanzania.结合卫生与环境卫生促进活动是否具有协同效应:来自坦桑尼亚农村地区一项大规模整群随机试验的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0186228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186228. eCollection 2017.