Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285276. eCollection 2023.
Detrimental associations of sedentary behaviour (time spent sitting) with musculoskeletal pain (MSP) conditions have been observed. However, findings on those with, or at risk of, type 2 diabetes (T2D) have not been reported. We examined the linear and non-linear associations of device-measured daily sitting time with MSP outcomes according to glucose metabolism status (GMS).
Cross-sectional data from 2827 participants aged 40-75 years in the Maastricht Study (1728 with normal glucose metabolism (NGM); 441 with prediabetes; 658 with T2D), for whom valid data were available on activPAL-derived daily sitting time, MSP [neck, shoulder, low back, and knee pain], and GMS. Associations were examined by logistic regression analyses, adjusted serially for relevant confounders, including moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and body mass index (BMI). Restricted cubic splines were used to further examine non-linear relationships.
The fully adjusted model (including BMI, MVPA, and history of cardiovascular disease) showed daily sitting time to be significantly associated with knee pain in the overall sample (OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 1.01-1.12) and in those with T2D (OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.00-1.22); this was not statistically significant in those with prediabetes (OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.91-1.18) or NGM (OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.98-1.13). There were no statistically significant associations between daily sitting time and neck, shoulder, or low back pain in any of the models. Furthermore, the non-linear relationships were statistically non-significant.
Among middle-aged and older adults with T2D, daily sitting time was significantly associated with higher odds of knee pain, but not with neck, shoulder, or low back pain. No significant association was observed in those without T2D for neck, shoulder, low back, or knee pain. Future studies, preferably those utilising prospective designs, could examine additional attributes of daily sitting (e.g., sitting bouts and domain-specific sitting time) and the potential relationships of knee pain with mobility limitations.
久坐行为(坐着的时间)与肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP)之间存在有害关联,这已得到观察。然而,对于患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)或有患 2 型糖尿病风险的人群,目前尚未有相关研究报告。我们根据葡萄糖代谢状态(GMS),研究了设备测量的每日久坐时间与 MSP 结果之间的线性和非线性关联。
这项横断面研究共纳入了 Maastricht 研究中的 2827 名年龄在 40-75 岁的参与者(1728 名血糖正常者(NGM);441 名糖尿病前期患者;658 名 T2D 患者),其中有效数据包括基于 activPAL 的每日久坐时间、MSP(颈部、肩部、下背部和膝关节疼痛)和 GMS。使用逻辑回归分析,按序调整了相关混杂因素(包括中等到剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)和体重指数(BMI)),以检查关联。使用限制性三次样条进一步检查非线性关系。
在完全调整的模型(包括 BMI、MVPA 和心血管疾病史)中,每日久坐时间与总体样本中的膝关节疼痛显著相关(OR = 1.07,95%CI:1.01-1.12)和 T2D 患者(OR = 1.11,95%CI:1.00-1.22);在糖尿病前期患者(OR = 1.04,95%CI:0.91-1.18)或 NGM 患者(OR = 1.05,95%CI:0.98-1.13)中,这无统计学意义。在任何模型中,每日久坐时间与颈部、肩部或下背部疼痛均无统计学显著关联。此外,非线性关系无统计学意义。
在患有 T2D 的中老年人群中,每日久坐时间与膝关节疼痛的几率增加显著相关,但与颈部、肩部或下背部疼痛无关。对于没有 T2D 的人群,颈部、肩部、下背部或膝关节疼痛均无显著关联。未来的研究,最好是使用前瞻性设计的研究,可以检查每日久坐的其他属性(例如,久坐时间和特定领域的久坐时间)以及膝关节疼痛与活动能力受限的潜在关系。