De Klerk Talitha C, Dounavi Despoina M, Hamilton David F, Clement Nick D, Kaliarntas Konstantinos T
School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Physiotherapy, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 5;4(5):315-328. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2023-0021.
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of home-based prehabilitation on pre- and postoperative outcomes in participants awaiting total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prehabilitation interventions for TKA and THA. MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Evidence was assessed by the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB2) tool. A total of 22 RCTs (1,601 patients) were identified with good overall quality and low risk of bias. Prehabilitation significantly improved pain prior to TKA (mean difference (MD) -1.02: p = 0.001), with non-significant improvements for function before (MD -0.48; p = 0.06) and after TKA (MD -0.69; p = 0.25). Small preoperative improvements were observed for pain (MD -0.02; p = 0.87) and function (MD -0.18; p = 0.16) prior to THA, but no post THA effect was found for pain (MD 0.19; p = 0.44) and function (MD 0.14; p = 0.68). A trend favouring usual care for improving quality of life (QoL) prior to TKA (MD 0.61; p = 0.34), but no effect on QoL prior (MD 0.03; p = 0.87) or post THA (MD -0.05; p = 0.83) was found. Prehabilitation significantly reduced hospital length of stay (LOS) for TKA (MD -0.43 days; p < 0.001) but not for THA (MD, -0.24; p = 0.12). Compliance was only reported in 11 studies and was excellent with a mean value of 90.5% (SD 6.82). Prehabilitation interventions improve pain and function prior to TKA and THA and reduce hospital LOS, though it is unclear if these effects enhance outcomes postoperatively.
本研究的目的是确定居家预康复对等待全膝关节置换术(TKA)和髋关节置换术(THA)患者术前和术后结果的有效性。对TKA和THA预康复干预的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、ProQuest、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年10月。采用PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险(ROB2)工具评估证据。共纳入22项RCT(1601例患者),总体质量良好,偏倚风险低。预康复显著改善了TKA术前的疼痛(平均差(MD)-1.02:p = 0.001),但对TKA术前(MD -0.48;p = 0.06)和术后(MD -0.69;p = 0.25)的功能改善不显著。THA术前疼痛(MD -0.02;p = 0.87)和功能(MD -0.18;p = 0.16)有小幅改善,但THA术后疼痛(MD 0.19;p = 0.44)和功能(MD 0.14;p = 0.68)未发现有改善效果。TKA术前改善生活质量(QoL)有倾向于常规护理的趋势(MD 0.61;p = 0.34),但对THA术前(MD 0.03;p = 0.87)或术后(MD -0.05;p = 0.83)的QoL无影响。预康复显著缩短了TKA的住院时间(LOS)(MD -0.43天;p < 0.001),但对THA无影响(MD,-0.24;p = 0.12)。仅11项研究报告了依从性,依从性良好,平均值为90.5%(标准差6.82)。预康复干预可改善TKA和THA术前的疼痛和功能,并缩短住院时间,不过尚不清楚这些效果是否能改善术后结果。