Taylor Carrie E V, Murray Carolyn M, Stanton Tasha R
IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health & Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, Allied Health & Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Pain Rep. 2022 May 9;7(3):e1006. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001006. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
Joint replacement surgery typically results in good clinical outcome, although some people experience suboptimal pain relief and functional improvement. Predicting surgical outcome is difficult.
There is merit in better understanding patients' perspectives of pain and function to identify avoidable problems perceived to contribute to their outcome, to inform prognostic expectations, and to identify potential cointerventions to sit alongside surgery that might mitigate pain/functional problems. Here, we aimed to synthesise the available literature exploring perspectives of people with knee osteoarthritis about their pain and function following joint replacement.
Six electronic databases and 2 websites were searched. Two independent reviewers completed study inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction. Data were iteratively synthesised using first-, second-, and third-order analyses.
Twenty-eight studies were included. Four themes were identified; perceptions of pain and function were inseparable. Theme 1 addressed experiences of recovery after surgery, which often differed from expectations. Theme 2 described the challenges of the pain experience and its functional impact, including the difficulty navigating medication use in context of personal beliefs and perceived stigma. Theme 3 articulated the toll of ongoing problems spanning pain-function-mood, necessitating the need to "endure." Theme 4 encompassed the importance of clinical/social interactions on mood and pain, with reports of concerns dismissed and practical support missing.
Together, these findings show that numerous individual considerations beyond the technical aspects of surgery influence experiences of pain and function. A tailored approach addressing these considerations from the patient perspective could provide a basis for improved success of knee replacement surgery.
关节置换手术通常能带来良好的临床效果,尽管有些人的疼痛缓解和功能改善并不理想。预测手术结果很困难。
更好地了解患者对疼痛和功能的看法有其价值,以便识别那些被认为会影响手术结果的可避免问题,为预后预期提供信息,并确定可能与手术同时进行的潜在辅助干预措施,以减轻疼痛/功能问题。在此,我们旨在综合现有文献,探讨膝骨关节炎患者对关节置换术后疼痛和功能的看法。
检索了六个电子数据库和两个网站。两名独立的评审员完成了研究纳入、质量评估和数据提取。使用一阶、二阶和三阶分析对数据进行迭代综合。
纳入了28项研究。确定了四个主题;对疼痛和功能的认知是不可分割的。主题1涉及手术后的恢复经历,这往往与预期不同。主题2描述了疼痛经历的挑战及其功能影响,包括在个人信念和感知到的耻辱感背景下使用药物的困难。主题3阐述了疼痛-功能-情绪持续问题的影响,这使得有必要“忍受”。主题4涵盖了临床/社会互动对情绪和疼痛的重要性,有报告称担忧被忽视且缺乏实际支持。
这些研究结果共同表明,除了手术技术方面之外,还有许多个人因素会影响疼痛和功能体验。从患者角度出发,针对这些因素采取量身定制的方法可为提高膝关节置换手术的成功率提供基础。