DeFeo T T, Morgan K G
Pflugers Arch. 1986 Apr;406(4):427-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00590948.
A comparison between the fluorescent indicator quin 2 and the bioluminescent indicator aequorin was performed in the same smooth muscle cell type. Aequorin was loaded into intact strips and quin was loaded into enzymatically isolated single cells from ferret portal vein. Both indicators gave qualitatively the same calcium profiles when the tissue was challenged with agonists. Quin loading caused a dramatic shift to the right in dose response curves to potassium and phenylephrine. The ED50 values for quin loaded cells were significantly different from those for control cells for both agonists. Intracellular calcium levels at rest were not significantly different with quin and aequorin. Cells stimulated with potassium gave significantly different intracellular calcium values with the two indicators suggesting a change in the stimulated steady state level due to the introduction of an additional calcium buffer (quin2) into the cell.
在同一种平滑肌细胞类型中对荧光指示剂喹啉2(quin 2)和生物发光指示剂水母发光蛋白(aequorin)进行了比较。将水母发光蛋白加载到完整的组织条中,将喹啉加载到从雪貂门静脉酶解分离的单个细胞中。当用激动剂刺激组织时,两种指示剂给出的钙信号在定性上是相同的。加载喹啉导致对钾和去氧肾上腺素的剂量反应曲线显著右移。对于这两种激动剂,加载喹啉的细胞的半数有效剂量(ED50)值与对照细胞的显著不同。静息时细胞内钙水平在喹啉和水母发光蛋白组之间没有显著差异。用钾刺激的细胞在两种指示剂下给出的细胞内钙值显著不同,这表明由于向细胞中引入了额外的钙缓冲剂(喹啉2),刺激后的稳态水平发生了变化。