Suppr超能文献

前瞻性马尔默乳房断层合成筛查试验中的假阳性召回。

False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.

机构信息

Department of Translational Medicine, Radiology Diagnostics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8089-8099. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09705-x. Epub 2023 May 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST).

METHODS

The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-view digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. False-positive recall rates, radiographic appearances, and biopsy rates were analyzed. Comparisons were made between DBT, DM, and DBT + DM, both in total and in trial year 1 compared to trial years 2 to 5, with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The false-positive recall rate was higher with DBT, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4; 1.8), compared to screening with DM, 0.8% (95% CI 0.7; 1.0). The proportion of the radiographic appearance of stellate distortion was 37.3% (91/244) with DBT, compared to 24.0% (29/121) with DM. The false-positive recall rate with DBT during trial year 1 was 2.6% (95% CI 1.8; 3.5), then stabilized at 1.5% (95% CI 1.3; 1.8) during trial years 2 to 5. The percentage of stellate distortion with DBT was 50% (19/38) trial year 1 compared to 35.0% (72/206) trial years 2 to 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher false-positive recall rate with DBT compared to DM was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings. The proportion of these findings, as well as the DBT false-positive recall rate, was reduced after the first trial year.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Assessment of false-positive recalls gives information on potential benefits and side effects in DBT screening.

KEY POINTS

• The false-positive recall rate in a prospective digital breast tomosynthesis screening trial was higher compared to digital mammography, but still low compared to other trials. • The higher false-positive recall rate with digital breast tomosynthesis was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings; the proportion of these findings was reduced after the first trial year.

摘要

目的

评估马尔默乳腺断层摄影筛查试验(MBTST)中假阳性召回的总数,包括影像学表现和假阳性活检。

方法

这项前瞻性、基于人群的 MBTST 纳入了 14848 名参与女性,旨在比较单视图数字乳腺断层摄影术(DBT)与双视图数字乳腺摄影术(DM)在乳腺癌筛查中的应用。分析了假阳性召回率、影像学表现和活检率。DBT、DM 和 DBT+DM 之间进行了比较,包括总数以及试验第 1 年与第 2 至 5 年的比较,比较采用了数字、百分比和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

DBT 的假阳性召回率为 1.6%(95%CI 1.4;1.8),高于 DM 的 0.8%(95%CI 0.7;1.0)。DBT 的星状变形影像学表现比例为 37.3%(91/244),而 DM 为 24.0%(29/121)。DBT 在试验第 1 年的假阳性召回率为 2.6%(95%CI 1.8;3.5),然后在第 2 至 5 年稳定在 1.5%(95%CI 1.3;1.8)。DBT 的星状变形比例在第 1 年为 50%(19/38),而在第 2 至 5 年为 35.0%(72/206)。

结论

DBT 的假阳性召回率高于 DM,主要是由于星状发现的检出率增加。这些发现的比例以及 DBT 的假阳性召回率在试验的第一年之后有所降低。

临床相关性声明

评估假阳性召回可以提供有关 DBT 筛查中潜在益处和副作用的信息。

关键点

  • 与数字乳腺摄影相比,前瞻性数字乳腺断层摄影筛查试验中的假阳性召回率更高,但与其他试验相比仍较低。

  • 数字乳腺断层摄影术的假阳性召回率较高,主要是由于星状发现的检出率增加;这些发现的比例在试验的第一年之后有所降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3362/10597871/320d31ee7c99/330_2023_9705_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验