Department of Translational Medicine, Radiology Diagnostics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8089-8099. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09705-x. Epub 2023 May 5.
To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST).
The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-view digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. False-positive recall rates, radiographic appearances, and biopsy rates were analyzed. Comparisons were made between DBT, DM, and DBT + DM, both in total and in trial year 1 compared to trial years 2 to 5, with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
The false-positive recall rate was higher with DBT, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4; 1.8), compared to screening with DM, 0.8% (95% CI 0.7; 1.0). The proportion of the radiographic appearance of stellate distortion was 37.3% (91/244) with DBT, compared to 24.0% (29/121) with DM. The false-positive recall rate with DBT during trial year 1 was 2.6% (95% CI 1.8; 3.5), then stabilized at 1.5% (95% CI 1.3; 1.8) during trial years 2 to 5. The percentage of stellate distortion with DBT was 50% (19/38) trial year 1 compared to 35.0% (72/206) trial years 2 to 5.
The higher false-positive recall rate with DBT compared to DM was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings. The proportion of these findings, as well as the DBT false-positive recall rate, was reduced after the first trial year.
Assessment of false-positive recalls gives information on potential benefits and side effects in DBT screening.
• The false-positive recall rate in a prospective digital breast tomosynthesis screening trial was higher compared to digital mammography, but still low compared to other trials. • The higher false-positive recall rate with digital breast tomosynthesis was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings; the proportion of these findings was reduced after the first trial year.
评估马尔默乳腺断层摄影筛查试验(MBTST)中假阳性召回的总数,包括影像学表现和假阳性活检。
这项前瞻性、基于人群的 MBTST 纳入了 14848 名参与女性,旨在比较单视图数字乳腺断层摄影术(DBT)与双视图数字乳腺摄影术(DM)在乳腺癌筛查中的应用。分析了假阳性召回率、影像学表现和活检率。DBT、DM 和 DBT+DM 之间进行了比较,包括总数以及试验第 1 年与第 2 至 5 年的比较,比较采用了数字、百分比和 95%置信区间(CI)。
DBT 的假阳性召回率为 1.6%(95%CI 1.4;1.8),高于 DM 的 0.8%(95%CI 0.7;1.0)。DBT 的星状变形影像学表现比例为 37.3%(91/244),而 DM 为 24.0%(29/121)。DBT 在试验第 1 年的假阳性召回率为 2.6%(95%CI 1.8;3.5),然后在第 2 至 5 年稳定在 1.5%(95%CI 1.3;1.8)。DBT 的星状变形比例在第 1 年为 50%(19/38),而在第 2 至 5 年为 35.0%(72/206)。
DBT 的假阳性召回率高于 DM,主要是由于星状发现的检出率增加。这些发现的比例以及 DBT 的假阳性召回率在试验的第一年之后有所降低。
评估假阳性召回可以提供有关 DBT 筛查中潜在益处和副作用的信息。
与数字乳腺摄影相比,前瞻性数字乳腺断层摄影筛查试验中的假阳性召回率更高,但与其他试验相比仍较低。
数字乳腺断层摄影术的假阳性召回率较高,主要是由于星状发现的检出率增加;这些发现的比例在试验的第一年之后有所降低。