School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom; Present Address: Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Aug;18(8):990-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.04.018. Epub 2023 May 4.
Socioeconomic inequalities in the utilization of conventional NSCLC treatments are well documented. Nevertheless, it is not known whether these inequalities are also observed with novel anticancer therapies. This study evaluated associations between deprivation and utilization of novel anticancer therapies targeting tumor biology, the immune system, or both, within the English national publicly funded health care system.
A retrospective analysis of 90,785 patients diagnosed with having a histologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, sourced from the English national population-based cancer registry and linked Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy database, was undertaken. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the likelihood of novel anticancer therapy utilization by deprivation category of area of residence at diagnosis (measured by quintiles of the income domain of the index of multiple deprivation).
Multivariable analyses revealed marked treatment inequalities by deprivation. Patients residing in the most deprived areas were more than half as likely to use any novel therapy (multivariable OR [mvOR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.49) compared with patients residing in the most affluent areas. Deprivation associations with treatment utilization were slightly stronger with targeted treatments ([most versus least deprived] mvOR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.35-0.43) than immune checkpoint inhibitors (mvOR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.51-0.66).
There are marked socioeconomic inequalities in NSCLC novel treatment utilization, even in the English National Health Service where treatment is free at the point of delivery. These findings have important implications for equitable delivery of drugs, which have transformed outcomes in metastatic lung cancer. Further work exploring the underlying causes is now needed.
社会经济地位不平等导致常规非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗方法的利用存在差异,这一点已得到充分证实。然而,目前尚不清楚新型抗癌疗法是否也存在这种差异。本研究评估了在英国国家公共资助的医疗保健体系中,新型抗癌疗法(针对肿瘤生物学、免疫系统或两者兼有的疗法)的利用与贫困程度之间的关联。
回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,从英国全国基于人群的癌症登记处和系统抗癌治疗数据库中获得的 90785 例组织学确诊为 IV 期 NSCLC 患者的资料。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估了居住地(通过收入领域的多重剥夺指数五分位数来衡量)的贫困程度与新型抗癌疗法利用之间的关系。
多变量分析显示,贫困程度与治疗存在显著差异。与居住在最富裕地区的患者相比,居住在最贫困地区的患者使用任何新型治疗方法的可能性要低一半以上(多变量比值比 [mvOR] = 0.45,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.41-0.49)。与免疫检查点抑制剂(mvOR = 0.58,95% CI:0.51-0.66)相比,靶向治疗(最贫穷与最富裕地区相比,mvOR = 0.39,95% CI:0.35-0.43)与治疗利用的相关性稍强。
即使在英国国家医疗服务体系(National Health Service,NHS)中,治疗是免费的,但 NSCLC 新型治疗方法的利用仍存在显著的社会经济不平等。这些发现对公平提供药物具有重要意义,因为这些药物改变了转移性肺癌的治疗结果。现在需要进一步探索潜在的原因。