Suppr超能文献

合并失眠和睡眠呼吸暂停的患者在接受气道正压治疗后神经认知功能改善,但在接受失眠的认知行为疗法后恶化:多学科治疗失眠和合并睡眠呼吸暂停研究中认知结果的探索性分析。

Neurocognitive functioning in comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea patients is better after positive airway pressure therapy, but worse after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: exploratory analysis of cognitive outcomes from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Insomnia and Comorbid Sleep Apnea study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2023 Aug 14;46(8). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad128.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Neurocognitive impairments in comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) are not well documented. We explored neurocognitive functioning and treatment effects in individuals with COMISA as an ancillary study to a randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Participants with COMISA (n = 45; 51.1% female; mean age = 52.07 ± 13.29 years), from a 3-arm randomized clinical trial combining cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and positive airway pressure (PAP) concurrently (CBT-I+PAP) or sequentially, completed neurocognitive testing at baseline, and post-treatment. Using Bayesian linear mixed models, we estimated effects of CBT-I, PAP, or CBT-I+PAP, compared to baseline, and CBT-I+PAP compared to PAP on 12 metrics across five cognitive domains.

RESULTS

This COMISA sample had worse neurocognitive performance at baseline than reported for insomnia, sleep apnea, and controls in the literature, though short-term memory and psychomotor speed performance appears intact. When comparing PAP to baseline, performance on all measures was better after treatment. Performance after CBT-I was worse compared to baseline, and only performance in attention/vigilance, executive functioning via Stroop interference and verbal memory was better with moderate-high effect sizes and moderate probability of superiority (61-83). Comparisons of CBT-I+PAP to baseline generated results similar to PAP and comparing CBT-I+PAP to PAP revealed superior performance in only attention/vigilance via psychomotor vigilance task lapses and verbal memory for PAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment combinations involving CBT-I were associated with poorer neurocognitive performance. These potentially temporary effects may stem from sleep restriction, a component of CBT-I often accompanied by initially reduced total sleep time. Future studies should examine long-term effects of individual and combined COMISA treatment pathways to inform treatment recommendations.

CLINICAL TRIAL

This was an ancillary study from a clinical trial (Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Insomnia and Comorbid Sleep Apnea (MATRICS), which was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01785303)).

摘要

研究目的

合并失眠和睡眠呼吸暂停(COMISA)的神经认知损伤尚未得到充分记录。我们作为一项随机临床试验的辅助研究,探讨了 COMISA 个体的神经认知功能和治疗效果。

方法

来自一项结合认知行为疗法治疗失眠(CBT-I)和正压通气(PAP)的三臂随机临床试验的 COMISA 参与者(n = 45;51.1%为女性;平均年龄 = 52.07 ± 13.29 岁),完成了基线和治疗后的神经认知测试。使用贝叶斯线性混合模型,我们估计了 CBT-I、PAP 或 CBT-I+PAP 与基线相比的治疗效果,以及 CBT-I+PAP 与 PAP 相比的治疗效果,在五个认知领域的 12 个指标上。

结果

与文献中失眠、睡眠呼吸暂停和对照组相比,COMISA 样本的神经认知表现较差,但短期记忆和精神运动速度表现正常。与基线相比,PAP 治疗后所有指标的表现均有所改善。与基线相比,CBT-I 治疗后的表现更差,只有在注意力/警觉性、执行功能(通过 Stroop 干扰和言语记忆)方面,效果中等偏强(61-83),且具有较高的优势可能性。与基线相比,CBT-I+PAP 的比较结果与 PAP 相似,而与 PAP 相比,CBT-I+PAP 仅在注意力/警觉性方面表现更好,通过精神运动警觉任务失误和言语记忆显示 PAP 的表现更好。

结论

涉及 CBT-I 的治疗组合与较差的神经认知表现相关。这些潜在的暂时影响可能源于睡眠限制,这是 CBT-I 的一个组成部分,通常伴随着最初总睡眠时间的减少。未来的研究应该检查 COMISA 治疗途径的个体和联合治疗的长期效果,为治疗建议提供信息。

临床试验

这是一项临床试验(多学科治疗失眠和合并睡眠呼吸暂停的方法(MATRICS))的辅助研究,该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT01785303)上预先注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a6/10424173/6d436df49253/zsad128_fig2.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验