Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; RE-SOURCE LAB, Laboratory of BioResource Recovery, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium.
Inagro vzw, Ieperseweg 87, 8800 Rumbeke-Beitem, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 1;889:163956. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163956. Epub 2023 May 4.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate duckweed ponds and constructed wetlands as polishing steps in pig manure liquid fraction treatment. Using nitrification-denitrification (NDN) of the liquid fraction as the starting point, the LCA compared direct land application of the NDN effluent with different combinations of duckweed ponds, constructed wetlands and discharge into natural waterbodies. Duckweed ponds and constructed wetlands are viewed as a viable tertiary treatment option and potential remedy for nutrient imbalances in areas of intense livestock farming, such as in Belgium. As the effluent stays in the duckweed pond, settling and microbial degradation reduce the remaining phosphorous and nitrogen concentrations. Combined with duckweed and/or wetland plants that take up nutrients in their plant body, this approach can reduce over-fertilisation and prevent excessive nitrogen losses to aquatic environments. In addition, duckweed could serve as an alternative livestock feed and replace imports of protein destined for animal consumption. The environmental performance of the overall treatment systems studied was found to depend greatly on assumptions about the possible avoidance of potassium fertiliser production through the field application of effluents. If it is assumed that the potassium contained in the effluent replaces mineral fertiliser, direct field application of the NDN effluent performed best. If the application of NDN effluent does not lead to mineral fertiliser savings or if the replaced K fertiliser is of low grade, duckweed ponds seem to be a viable additional step in the manure treatment chain. Consequently, whenever background concentrations of N and/or P in fields allow for effluent application and potassium fertiliser substitution, direct application should be favoured over further treatment. If direct land application of the NDN effluent is not an option, the focus should be on long residence times in duckweed ponds to allow for maximum nutrient uptake and feed production.
生命周期评估(LCA)被应用于评估浮萍塘和人工湿地作为猪粪液体部分处理的后处理步骤。以液体部分的硝化-反硝化(NDN)为起点,LCA 将 NDN 流出物的直接土地应用与浮萍塘、人工湿地和排入天然水体的不同组合进行了比较。浮萍塘和人工湿地被视为一种可行的三级处理选择,也是解决集约化畜牧业地区养分失衡的潜在方法,例如比利时。由于流出物停留在浮萍塘中,沉降和微生物降解会降低剩余的磷和氮浓度。结合浮萍和/或湿地植物吸收植物体内的养分,这种方法可以减少过度施肥,并防止氮素过度流失到水生环境中。此外,浮萍可以作为一种替代牲畜饲料,替代用于动物消费的进口蛋白质。研究中整体处理系统的环境性能发现,很大程度上取决于通过田间应用流出物来避免钾肥生产的假设。如果假设流出物中所含的钾替代了矿物肥料,那么直接田间应用 NDN 流出物的效果最佳。如果 NDN 流出物的应用不能导致矿物肥料的节省,或者所替代的 K 肥料质量较低,那么浮萍塘似乎是粪便处理链中的一个可行的附加步骤。因此,只要田间的 N 和/或 P 背景浓度允许流出物应用和钾肥替代,就应优先考虑直接应用,而不是进一步处理。如果 NDN 流出物的直接土地应用不可行,则应重点关注浮萍塘中的长停留时间,以实现最大的养分吸收和饲料生产。