LTD High Technology Hospital Med Center, Batumi, Georgia.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Cancer. 2023 Jul 15;129(14):2256-2265. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34687. Epub 2023 May 8.
EMPOWER-Lung 3, a randomized 2:1 phase 3 trial, showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant overall survival improvement with cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
PROs were assessed at day 1 (baseline), the start of each treatment cycle (every 3 weeks) for the first six doses, and then at start of every three cycles, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life-Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13) questionnaires. Prespecified analyses included a longitudinal mixed-effect model comparing treatment arms and a time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD) analysis performed for global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) and all scales from the questionnaires. Between-arm TTD comparisons were made using a stratified log-rank test and proportional hazards model.
A total of 312 patients were assigned to receive cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy and 154 to receive placebo plus chemotherapy; 391 (83.9%) were male and the median age was 63.0 years (range, 25-84). For pain symptoms (EORTC QLQ-C30), a statistically significant overall improvement from baseline (-4.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.36 to -1.60, p = .004) and a statistically significant delay in TTD (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.60, p < .0001) favoring cemiplimab plus chemotherapy were observed. Statistically significant delays in TTD, all favoring cemiplimab plus chemotherapy, were also observed in functioning and symptom scales. A significant overall improvement from baseline in GHS/QoL was seen for cemiplimab plus chemotherapy compared with nonsignificant overall change from baseline for placebo plus chemotherapy (1.69, 95% CI, 0.20-3.19 vs. 1.08, 95% CI, -1.34 to 3.51; between arms, p = .673). No analyses yielded statistically significant PRO results favoring placebo plus chemotherapy for any QLQ-C30 or QLQ-LC13 scale.
Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant overall improvement in pain symptoms and delayed TTD in cancer-related and lung cancer-specific symptoms and functions.
EMPOWER-Lung 3 是一项随机、2:1 的 3 期临床试验,结果显示,在一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌方面,与安慰剂加化疗相比,西米普利单抗联合铂类双联化疗可显著改善总生存期,具有临床意义和统计学意义。本研究评估了患者报告的结局(PROs)。
在第 1 天(基线)、每 3 周进行的前 6 个治疗周期开始时以及之后每 3 个周期开始时,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量核心 30 项(QLQ-C30)和生活质量-肺癌模块(QLQ-LC13)问卷评估 PROs。预设分析包括比较治疗组的纵向混合效应模型和用于全球健康状况/生活质量(GHS/QoL)和问卷所有量表的明确临床意义恶化的时间至定义(TTD)分析。使用分层对数秩检验和比例风险模型进行组间 TTD 比较。
共有 312 名患者被分配接受西米普利单抗联合铂类双联化疗,154 名患者接受安慰剂联合化疗;391 名(83.9%)为男性,中位年龄为 63.0 岁(范围 25-84 岁)。对于疼痛症状(EORTC QLQ-C30),与基线相比,总体有统计学意义的改善(-4.98,95%置信区间 [CI] -8.36 至 -1.60,p = 0.004),并且 TTD 有统计学意义的延迟(风险比,0.39;95%CI,0.26-0.60,p < 0.0001),均有利于西米普利单抗联合化疗。在功能和症状量表中也观察到 TTD 的统计学显著延迟,所有这些都有利于西米普利单抗联合化疗。与安慰剂加化疗相比,西米普利单抗加化疗在 GHS/QoL 方面从基线开始的总体改善具有统计学意义(1.69,95%CI,0.20-3.19 与 1.08,95%CI,-1.34 至 3.51;两组间,p = 0.673)。没有分析结果表明,与安慰剂加化疗相比,任何 QLQ-C30 或 QLQ-LC13 量表都有利于安慰剂加化疗。
西米普利单抗联合化疗可显著改善与癌症和肺癌相关的症状和功能的疼痛症状,并延迟 TTD。