Suppr超能文献

一线未选择PD-L1的晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗策略:基于免疫疗法的方案按PD-L1表达和临床指征的比较性综述

Treatment Strategies for First-Line PD-L1-Unselected Advanced NSCLC: A Comparative Review of Immunotherapy-Based Regimens by PD-L1 Expression and Clinical Indication.

作者信息

Resuli Blerina, Kauffmann-Guerrero Diego, Arredondo Lasso Maria Nieves, Behr Jürgen, Tufman Amanda

机构信息

Department of Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;15(15):1937. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151937.

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October 2016 to September 2024. Phase II and III randomized trials evaluating ICI monotherapy, ICI-chemotherapy combinations, and dual ICI regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). PD-1-targeted therapies demonstrated superior OS compared to PD-L1-based regimens, with cemiplimab monotherapyranking highest for OS benefit (posterior probability: 90%), followed by sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and pemetrexed-PBC. PFS atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC, and camrelizumab plus PBC were the most effective regimens. ICI-chemotherapy combinations achieved higher ORRs but were associated with greater toxicity. The most favorable safety profiles were observed with cemiplimab, nivolumab, and avelumab monotherapy, while atezolizumab plus PBC and sugemalimab plus PBC carried the highest toxicity burdens. In PD-L1-unselected advanced NSCLC, PD-1 blockade-particularly cemiplimab monotherapy-and rationally designed ICI-chemotherapy combinations represent the most efficacious treatment strategies. Balancing efficacy with safety remains critical, especially in the absence of predictive biomarkers. These findings support a patient-tailored approach to immunotherapy and highlight the need for further biomarker-driven and real-world investigations to optimize treatment selection.

摘要

肺癌仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。筛查、诊断和治疗方面的进展改变了临床实践,尤其是免疫疗法和靶向疗法的整合。我们对2016年10月至2024年9月期间进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了评估晚期非小细胞肺癌患者使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药治疗、ICI-化疗联合方案和双ICI方案的II期和III期随机试验。感兴趣的结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和治疗相关不良事件(AE)。与基于PD-L1的方案相比,靶向PD-1的疗法显示出更好的OS,西米普利单抗单药治疗的OS获益最高(后验概率:90%),其次是信迪利单抗加铂类化疗(PBC)和培美曲塞-PBC。阿替利珠单抗加贝伐单抗和PBC以及卡瑞利珠单抗加PBC的PFS是最有效的方案。ICI-化疗联合方案实现了更高的客观缓解率(ORR),但毒性更大。西米普利单抗、纳武利尤单抗和阿维鲁单抗单药治疗观察到最有利的安全性,而阿替利珠单抗加PBC和苏金单抗加PBC的毒性负担最高。在未选择PD-L1的晚期非小细胞肺癌中,PD-1阻断——尤其是西米普利单抗单药治疗——以及合理设计的ICI-化疗联合方案代表了最有效的治疗策略。在疗效和安全性之间取得平衡仍然至关重要,尤其是在缺乏预测生物标志物的情况下。这些发现支持针对患者的免疫治疗方法,并强调需要进一步进行生物标志物驱动的和真实世界的研究,以优化治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c552/12345754/73c843ec5f2f/diagnostics-15-01937-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验