Suppr超能文献

TightRope与钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的长期临床疗效

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After TightRope Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

作者信息

Ko Sang Hun, Lee Chae-Chill, Jeon Young Dae, Han Jung Won, Lee Kyung Joo

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Apr 28;11(4):23259671231165097. doi: 10.1177/23259671231165097. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited information regarding the long-term efficacy of techniques for surgical fixation after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of hook plate (HP) and TightRope (TR) fixation for acute AC joint dislocations by comparing the long-term clinical and radiological patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 61 patients with acute AC joint dislocation between July 2011 and November 2015. The patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: HP (n = 36) and TR (n = 25). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score; the Korean Shoulder Score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Side-to-side coracoclavicular (CC) distance on radiographs, postoperative complications, and the rate of subacromial erosion in the HP group were also assessed between procedures.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 1.0 years, and there were no significant differences in pain or outcome scores between the HP and TR groups (all > .05). Forward flexion was better in the TR group (172.6° ± 5.6°) versus the HP group (166.0° ± 10.8°; = .002). The percentages of patients with a difference in the side-to-side CC distance of <5 mm were 83.3% and 72.0% in the HP and TR groups, respectively ( = .288). Complications were found in 2 patients in the HP group and 1 in the TR group ( ≥ .999). Subacromial erosion was observed in 41.7% of patients after HP fixation, with no difference in VAS pain scores at the final follow-up in patients with versus without subacromial erosion ( = .719).

CONCLUSION

When comparing HP with TR fixation for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocations, there were no significant differences in functional outcome scores, final CC distance, or complications. Slightly better forward flexion was seen after TR fixation. Subacromial erosion occurred in 40% of patients after HP fixation, but this did not affect long-term VAS pain scores. Both surgical techniques are effective treatment options for AC joint dislocation.

摘要

背景

关于肩锁关节(AC)脱位后手术固定技术的长期疗效,相关信息有限。

目的

通过比较长期临床和影像学患者结局,评估钩钢板(HP)和TightRope(TR)固定治疗急性AC关节脱位的疗效。

研究设计

队列研究,证据等级:3级。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2011年7月至2015年11月期间61例急性AC关节脱位患者的数据。患者根据手术方式分组:HP组(n = 36)和TR组(n = 25)。末次随访时的临床结局采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛;美国肩肘外科评分;韩国肩部评分;以及加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分。还比较了两组手术前后X线片上的肩锁(CC)间距、术后并发症以及HP组肩峰下侵蚀率。

结果

平均随访期为7.0±1.0年,HP组和TR组在疼痛或结局评分方面无显著差异(均P>.05)。TR组的前屈角度(172.6°±5.6°)优于HP组(166.0°±10.8°;P = .002)。HP组和TR组肩锁间距差异<5 mm的患者百分比分别为83.3%和72.0%(P = .288)。HP组有2例患者出现并发症,TR组有1例(P≥.999)。HP固定术后41.7%的患者出现肩峰下侵蚀,有肩峰下侵蚀和无肩峰下侵蚀的患者在末次随访时VAS疼痛评分无差异(P = .719)。

结论

比较HP和TR固定治疗急性AC关节脱位时,功能结局评分、最终CC间距或并发症方面无显著差异。TR固定后前屈角度略好。HP固定术后40%的患者出现肩峰下侵蚀,但这并不影响长期VAS疼痛评分。两种手术技术都是治疗AC关节脱位的有效选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7d/10155023/a1a9a84288d9/10.1177_23259671231165097-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验