Ren Gang, Huang Xiaowen
Department of Orthopedics, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, No.2 Yabao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 8;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06032-3.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of suture stabilization of the acromioclavicular (AC) ligament plus clavicular hook plate fixation vs. total ligament repair with loop plates for treating AC joint dislocation.
Sixty-five patients who were admitted to Department of Orthopedics at Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University) and Capital Center for Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University for AC joint dislocation from January 2021 to June 2023, and satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into Group A and Group B. There were 34 patients in Group A (study group), including 22 males and 12 females with an average age of 42.1 ± 6.8 years old. They received suture stabilization of the AC ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation. There were 31 patients in Group B (control group), including 20 males and 11 females with an average age of 41.6 ± 7.5 years old. They received total ligament repair using Endobutton loop plates, which consisted of anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of the CC ligaments and anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of the AC ligament. The two groups were compared in terms of general surgical parameters, hospitalization parameters, complications, reduction degree, imaging parameters, and Constant-Murley Score for Shoulder Function.
All patients were followed up for 6 to 16 months, with an average of 9.7 months. Group A outperformed Group B significantly in several parameters, including the operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs (P < 0.05). Group A also outperformed Group B significantly in the reduction degree (P < 0.05). As for the Constant-Murley Score for Shoulder Function, the two groups did not differ significantly before surgery or at 6 months after surgery (P > 0.05). However, Group A outperformed Group B significantly in the Constant-Murley Score for Shoulder Function after the removal of internal fixation (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of complications or imaging parameters (P > 0.05).
Suture stabilization of the acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation achieved satisfactory elastic and rigid fixation concurrently in AC joint dislocation, increasing AC joint stability in all directions. Besides, this procedure significantly decreased the stress load acting around the AC joint, which further decreased the complications. Suture stabilization of the ligaments combined with clavicular hook plate fixation was conducive to restoring shoulder functions, and had a higher economic efficiency. This surgical procedure deserves special attention.
本研究旨在比较肩锁(AC)韧带缝合固定联合锁骨钩钢板固定与使用袢钢板进行全韧带修复治疗AC关节脱位的临床疗效。
回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年6月在江苏省人民医院(南京医科大学第一附属医院)骨科及首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院收治的65例符合纳入及排除标准的AC关节脱位患者。将这些患者分为A组和B组。A组(研究组)34例,其中男性22例,女性12例,平均年龄42.1±6.8岁,接受AC韧带缝合固定联合锁骨钩钢板固定。B组(对照组)31例,其中男性20例,女性11例,平均年龄41.6±7.5岁,接受使用Endobutton袢钢板进行全韧带修复,包括喙锁韧带的解剖双束重建和AC韧带的解剖单束重建。比较两组的一般手术参数、住院参数、并发症、复位程度、影像学参数及肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分。
所有患者均随访6至16个月,平均9.7个月。A组在手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、住院时间及住院费用等多项参数上均显著优于B组(P<0.05)。A组在复位程度上也显著优于B组(P<0.05)。在肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分方面,术前及术后6个月两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但内固定取出后,A组肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分显著优于B组(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率及影像学参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
肩锁韧带缝合固定联合锁骨钩钢板固定在AC关节脱位中同时实现了满意的弹性和刚性固定,增加了AC关节各方向的稳定性。此外,该手术显著降低了AC关节周围的应力负荷,进一步减少了并发症。韧带缝合固定联合锁骨钩钢板固定有利于恢复肩关节功能,且具有更高的经济效益。该手术方法值得特别关注。