Jonker J J, Sing A K, de Boer A C, den Ottolander G J
Thromb Res. 1986 Jun 1;42(5):681-8. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(86)90346-4.
The clinical value of adding thermographic leg scanning to impedance plethysmography was evaluated and compared in 52 patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis. Both tests were performed on the day of referral and phlebography within 72 hours. The sensitivity of thermography was 83%, the specificity 41% and the accuracy 61%. In comparison IPG had a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 96% and an accuracy of 90% The combination of thermography and IPG showed a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 41% and an accuracy of 65%. It is concluded that the addition of thermography to IPG is of no clinical value.
对52例临床疑似深静脉血栓形成的患者,评估并比较了在阻抗体积描记法基础上加用腿部热成像扫描的临床价值。两项检查均在转诊当天进行,并在72小时内进行静脉造影。热成像扫描的敏感性为83%,特异性为41%,准确性为61%。相比之下,阻抗体积描记法的敏感性为83%,特异性为96%,准确性为90%。热成像扫描与阻抗体积描记法联合使用时,敏感性为92%,特异性为41%,准确性为65%。结论是,在阻抗体积描记法基础上加用热成像扫描无临床价值。