• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of timing of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis on thromboembolic, bleeding, and other complications during and after antireflux surgery: multicentre cohort study.抗反流手术后围手术期化学血栓预防时机对术中及术后血栓栓塞、出血和其他并发症的影响:多中心队列研究。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad044.
2
Chemical thromboprophylaxis before skin closure increases bleeding risk after major ventral hernia repair: A multicenter cohort study.皮肤缝合前的化学性血栓预防会增加大型腹侧疝修补术后的出血风险:一项多中心队列研究。
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Early Versus Postoperative Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated with Increased Bleeding Risk Following Abdominal Visceral Resections: a Multicenter Cohort Study.早期与术后化学性血栓预防在腹部内脏切除术后与增加出血风险相关:一项多中心队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1495-1502. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05301-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Optimal Timing of Perioperative Chemical Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.择期大型腹部手术围手术期化学性血栓预防的最佳时机:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):904-911. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005764. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
The impact of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and disease-stage on postoperative bleeding following colorectal cancer surgery.药物性血栓预防和疾病分期对结直肠癌手术后出血的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 27;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1653-1.
6
Incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding after pulmonary lobectomy: evaluating the timing for thromboprophylaxis.肺叶切除术后静脉血栓栓塞症和出血的发生率:评估血栓预防的时机。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 May;51(4):997-1004. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02277-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Risk of bleeding associated with use of systemic thromboembolic prophylaxis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用全身血栓栓塞预防的出血风险。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):979-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8786. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Variations in practice of thromboprophylaxis across general surgical subspecialties: a multicentre (PROTECTinG) study of elective major surgeries.普通外科各亚专业血栓预防实践的差异:一项针对择期大手术的多中心(PROTECTinG)研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2441-2448. doi: 10.1111/ans.16374. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
9
Pre-operative and intra-operative chemical thromboprophylaxis increases bleeding risk following elective cholecystectomy: a multicentre (PROTECTinG) study.术前及术中化学性血栓预防增加择期胆囊切除术后出血风险:一项多中心(PROTECTinG)研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2449-2455. doi: 10.1111/ans.15998. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Incidence of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage related safety studies of preoperative anticoagulation therapy in hip fracture patients undergoing surgical treatment: a case-control study.髋部骨折手术治疗患者术前抗凝治疗相关静脉血栓栓塞和出血的发生率及安全性研究:一项病例对照研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 12;17:76. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0917-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative Timing of Chemoprophylaxis and Its Impact on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.术后化学预防时机及其对大型腹部手术后血栓栓塞和出血的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1174-1183. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06899-5. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
2
Optimal Timing of Perioperative Chemical Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.择期大型腹部手术围手术期化学性血栓预防的最佳时机:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):904-911. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005764. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
Optimal Timing of Perioperative Chemoprophylaxis in Patients With High Thromboembolic Risk Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.接受大腹部手术的高血栓栓塞风险患者围手术期化学预防的最佳时机:一项多中心队列研究
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):79-86. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005697. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Global practice variation in pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for general and gynaecological surgery: systematic review.普通外科和妇科手术中药物性血栓预防的全球实践差异:系统评价
BJS Open. 2022 Sep 2;6(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac129.
5
Early Versus Postoperative Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated with Increased Bleeding Risk Following Abdominal Visceral Resections: a Multicenter Cohort Study.早期与术后化学性血栓预防在腹部内脏切除术后与增加出血风险相关:一项多中心队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1495-1502. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05301-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Chemical thromboprophylaxis before skin closure increases bleeding risk after major ventral hernia repair: A multicenter cohort study.皮肤缝合前的化学性血栓预防会增加大型腹侧疝修补术后的出血风险:一项多中心队列研究。
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
7
Timing of Perioperative Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Initiation and its Effect on Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.围手术期药物性血栓预防开始时机及其对静脉血栓栓塞和出血结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Nov;233(5):619-631.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.07.687. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Perioperative thromboprophylaxis is highly variable in general surgery: results from a multicentre survey.普通外科手术围手术期血栓预防措施差异很大:一项多中心调查结果
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2401-2403. doi: 10.1111/ans.16223.
9
Variations in practice of thromboprophylaxis across general surgical subspecialties: a multicentre (PROTECTinG) study of elective major surgeries.普通外科各亚专业血栓预防实践的差异:一项针对择期大手术的多中心(PROTECTinG)研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2441-2448. doi: 10.1111/ans.16374. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
10
Pre-operative and intra-operative chemical thromboprophylaxis increases bleeding risk following elective cholecystectomy: a multicentre (PROTECTinG) study.术前及术中化学性血栓预防增加择期胆囊切除术后出血风险:一项多中心(PROTECTinG)研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2449-2455. doi: 10.1111/ans.15998. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

抗反流手术后围手术期化学血栓预防时机对术中及术后血栓栓塞、出血和其他并发症的影响:多中心队列研究。

Effect of timing of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis on thromboembolic, bleeding, and other complications during and after antireflux surgery: multicentre cohort study.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad044.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad044
PMID:37158433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10167705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend the use of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis for antireflux surgery, the optimal timing for its initiation is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perioperative timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis affects bleeding, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, and complication rates in patients undergoing antireflux surgery.

METHODS

This study involved analysis of prospectively maintained databases and medical records of all elective antireflux surgeries in 36 hospitals across Australia over 10 years.

RESULTS

Overall, chemical thromboprophylaxis was given early (before surgery or intraoperatively) in 1099 (25.6 per cent) patients, and after surgery in 3202 (74.4 per cent) patients, with comparable exposure doses between the two groups. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk was unrelated to chemical thromboprophylaxis timing (0.5 versus 0.6 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 2.47, P = 1.000). Postoperative bleeding developed in 34 (0.8 per cent) patients, and 781 intraoperative adverse events were identified in 544 (12.6 per cent) patients. Both intraoperative bleeding and complications were associated with significantly higher postoperative morbidity affecting multiple organ systems. Importantly, compared with postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis, early administration increased the risk of postoperative bleeding ((1.5 versus 0.5 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (OR 2.94, 95 per cent c.i. 1.48 to 5.84, P = 0.002)) and intraoperative adverse events ((16.1 versus 11.5 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (OR 1.48, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 1.80, P < 0.001)), as well as independently predicted their occurrences.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative adverse events and bleeding that occur during and after antireflux surgery are associated with significant morbidity. Compared with postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis, early initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis confers a significantly higher risk of intraoperative bleeding complications, without appreciable additional protection from symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Therefore, postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis should be recommended for patients undergoing antireflux surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管指南建议在抗反流手术中使用围手术期化学血栓预防,但起始的最佳时机尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨抗反流手术后化学血栓预防的围手术期时机是否会影响出血、有症状的静脉血栓栓塞和并发症的发生率。

方法

本研究分析了澳大利亚 36 家医院 10 年来所有择期抗反流手术的前瞻性维护数据库和病历。

结果

总体而言,1099 例(25.6%)患者接受了早期(手术前或手术中)化学血栓预防,3202 例(74.4%)患者接受了术后化学血栓预防,两组的暴露剂量相当。有症状的静脉血栓栓塞风险与化学血栓预防时机无关(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 0.5%和 0.6%(比值比(OR)0.97,95%置信区间 0.41 至 2.47,P=1.000)。34 例(0.8%)患者出现术后出血,544 例(12.6%)患者发生 781 例术中不良事件。术中出血和并发症均与多个器官系统的显著更高的术后发病率相关。重要的是,与术后化学血栓预防相比,早期给药增加了术后出血的风险(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 1.5%和 0.5%(OR 2.94,95%置信区间 1.48 至 5.84,P=0.002)和术中不良事件(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 16.1%和 11.5%(OR 1.48,95%置信区间 1.22 至 1.80,P<0.001)),并独立预测了它们的发生。

结论

抗反流手术后发生的术中不良事件和出血与显著的发病率相关。与术后化学血栓预防相比,早期开始化学血栓预防会显著增加术中出血并发症的风险,而不能明显增加对有症状的静脉血栓栓塞的保护。因此,应建议接受抗反流手术的患者进行术后化学血栓预防。