BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad044.
Although guidelines recommend the use of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis for antireflux surgery, the optimal timing for its initiation is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perioperative timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis affects bleeding, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, and complication rates in patients undergoing antireflux surgery.
This study involved analysis of prospectively maintained databases and medical records of all elective antireflux surgeries in 36 hospitals across Australia over 10 years.
Overall, chemical thromboprophylaxis was given early (before surgery or intraoperatively) in 1099 (25.6 per cent) patients, and after surgery in 3202 (74.4 per cent) patients, with comparable exposure doses between the two groups. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk was unrelated to chemical thromboprophylaxis timing (0.5 versus 0.6 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 2.47, P = 1.000). Postoperative bleeding developed in 34 (0.8 per cent) patients, and 781 intraoperative adverse events were identified in 544 (12.6 per cent) patients. Both intraoperative bleeding and complications were associated with significantly higher postoperative morbidity affecting multiple organ systems. Importantly, compared with postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis, early administration increased the risk of postoperative bleeding ((1.5 versus 0.5 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (OR 2.94, 95 per cent c.i. 1.48 to 5.84, P = 0.002)) and intraoperative adverse events ((16.1 versus 11.5 per cent for early and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis respectively (OR 1.48, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 1.80, P < 0.001)), as well as independently predicted their occurrences.
Intraoperative adverse events and bleeding that occur during and after antireflux surgery are associated with significant morbidity. Compared with postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis, early initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis confers a significantly higher risk of intraoperative bleeding complications, without appreciable additional protection from symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Therefore, postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis should be recommended for patients undergoing antireflux surgery.
尽管指南建议在抗反流手术中使用围手术期化学血栓预防,但起始的最佳时机尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨抗反流手术后化学血栓预防的围手术期时机是否会影响出血、有症状的静脉血栓栓塞和并发症的发生率。
本研究分析了澳大利亚 36 家医院 10 年来所有择期抗反流手术的前瞻性维护数据库和病历。
总体而言,1099 例(25.6%)患者接受了早期(手术前或手术中)化学血栓预防,3202 例(74.4%)患者接受了术后化学血栓预防,两组的暴露剂量相当。有症状的静脉血栓栓塞风险与化学血栓预防时机无关(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 0.5%和 0.6%(比值比(OR)0.97,95%置信区间 0.41 至 2.47,P=1.000)。34 例(0.8%)患者出现术后出血,544 例(12.6%)患者发生 781 例术中不良事件。术中出血和并发症均与多个器官系统的显著更高的术后发病率相关。重要的是,与术后化学血栓预防相比,早期给药增加了术后出血的风险(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 1.5%和 0.5%(OR 2.94,95%置信区间 1.48 至 5.84,P=0.002)和术中不良事件(早期和术后化学血栓预防分别为 16.1%和 11.5%(OR 1.48,95%置信区间 1.22 至 1.80,P<0.001)),并独立预测了它们的发生。
抗反流手术后发生的术中不良事件和出血与显著的发病率相关。与术后化学血栓预防相比,早期开始化学血栓预防会显著增加术中出血并发症的风险,而不能明显增加对有症状的静脉血栓栓塞的保护。因此,应建议接受抗反流手术的患者进行术后化学血栓预防。