University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107095. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107095. Epub 2023 May 8.
The objectives of this study were to 1) collect and analyze recent pedestrian crash cases for better understanding of the pedestrian injury distribution and mechanism, 2) use computational simulations to reconstruct pedestrian cases and estimate potential benefit of pedestrian automatic emergency braking (PedAEB) in reducing pedestrian injury risks, and 3) estimate how future pedestrian crash distribution might influence priorities for pedestrian protection. Analyses of national crash-injury dataset showed that the overall number of pedestrians in crashes as well as the serious and fatal pedestrian injuries in the U.S. have been increasing in recent years. Striking vehicle type has changed (i.e., decreased proportion of passenger cars and increase of SUVs and pickup trucks) from 20 years ago mirroring changes in the fleet distribution of vehicle sales. A total of 432 pedestrian injury cases were generated by linking the Michigan trauma data and police-reported crash data from 2013 to 2018. Among the linked cases, pickup trucks and SUVs were involved in crashes with more injuries across body regions. Notably, AIS 3+ chest injuries occur at almost the same rate as lower extremity injuries. A method, combining MADYMO simulations (n = 3,500), response surface model, and data mining, was developed to reconstruct 25 linked pedestrian crash cases to estimate the effectiveness of PedAEB. Based on national field data and MADYMO simulations, PedAEB was estimated to be effective in reducing the risk of head and lower extremity injuries but is relatively less effective in reducing the risk of chest injuries. The increased proportions of SUVs and pickup trucks in the vehicle fleet and the higher penetration of PedAEB may highlight the importance of future research into chest injury risk for pedestrian protection.
1)收集和分析最近的行人碰撞案例,以更好地了解行人受伤分布和机制;2)使用计算模拟来重建行人案例,并估计行人自动紧急制动(PedAEB)在降低行人受伤风险方面的潜在益处;3)估计未来行人碰撞分布可能如何影响行人保护的优先级。对国家碰撞伤害数据集的分析表明,近年来,美国行人碰撞事故的总体数量以及严重和致命行人受伤的数量一直在增加。撞击车辆类型已经发生了变化(即,乘用车比例下降,SUV 和皮卡车比例增加),与车辆销售车队分布的变化相吻合。通过将密歇根创伤数据和 2013 年至 2018 年的警方报告的碰撞数据联系起来,共生成了 432 例行人受伤案例。在所联系的案例中,皮卡车和 SUV 在各身体区域的受伤程度更高。值得注意的是,AIS3+胸部受伤的发生率几乎与下肢受伤的发生率相同。结合 MADYMO 模拟(n=3500)、响应面模型和数据挖掘,开发了一种方法来重建 25 例关联行人碰撞案例,以估计 PedAEB 的有效性。基于国家现场数据和 MADYMO 模拟,估计 PedAEB 可有效降低头部和下肢受伤的风险,但在降低胸部受伤的风险方面效果相对较低。SUV 和皮卡车在车队中的比例增加以及 PedAEB 的渗透率提高,可能凸显了未来行人保护中胸部受伤风险研究的重要性。