Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, University of Virginia Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):806-814.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.039. Epub 2023 May 8.
As medical education systems increasingly move toward competency-based training, it is important to understand the tools available to assess competency and how these tools are utilized. The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) offers a smart phone-based assessment system that supports workplace-based assessment of residents' and fellows' operative autonomy, performance, and case complexity. The purpose of this study was to characterize implementation of the SIMPL app within vascular surgery integrated residency (0+5) and fellowship (5+2) training programs.
SIMPL operative ratings recorded between 2018 and 2022 were collected from all participating vascular surgery training institutions (n = 9 institutions with 5+2 and 0+5 programs; n = 4 institutions with 5+2 program only). The characteristics of programs, trainees, faculty, and SIMPL operative assessments were evaluated using descriptive statistics.
Operative assessments were completed for 2457 cases by 85 attendings and 86 trainees, totaling 4615 unique operative assessment ratings. Attendings included dictated feedback in 52% of assessments. Senior-level residents received more assessments than junior-level residents (postgraduate year [PGY]1-3, n = 439; PGY4-5, n = 551). Performance ratings demonstrated increases from junior to senior trainees for both resident and fellow cohorts with "performance-ready" or "exceptional performance" ratings increasing by nearly two-fold for PGY1 to PGY5 residents (28.1% vs 40.6%), and from first- to second-year fellows (PGY6, 46.7%; PGY7, 60.3%). Similar gains in autonomy were demonstrated as trainees progressed through training. Senior residents were more frequently granted autonomy with "supervision only" than junior residents (PGY1, 8.7%; PGY5, 21.6%). "Supervision only" autonomy ratings were granted to 21.8% of graduating fellows. Assessment data included a greater proportion of complex cases for senior compared with junior fellows (PGY6, 20.9% vs PGY7, 26.5%). Program Directors felt that faculty and trainee buy-in were the main barriers to implementation of the SIMPL assessment app.
This is the first description of the SIMPL app as an operative assessment tool within vascular surgery that has been successfully implemented in both residency and fellowship programs. The assessment data demonstrates expected progressive gains in trainees' autonomy and performance, as well as increasing case complexity, across PGY years. Given the selection of SIMPL as the assessment platform for required American Board of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Board Entrustable Professional Activities assessments, understanding facilitators and barriers to implementation of workplace-based assessments using this app is imperative, particularly as we move toward competency-based medical education.
随着医学教育系统越来越倾向于以能力为基础的培训,了解评估能力的工具以及这些工具的使用方法非常重要。改善医学专业学习协会(SIMPL)提供了一种基于智能手机的评估系统,可支持对住院医师和研究员的手术自主性、表现和病例复杂性进行基于工作场所的评估。本研究的目的是描述 SIMPL 应用程序在血管外科综合住院医师(0+5)和研究员(5+2)培训计划中的实施情况。
从所有参与血管外科培训的机构(5+2 和 0+5 计划的 9 个机构;仅 5+2 计划的 4 个机构)中收集了 2018 年至 2022 年间记录的 SIMPL 手术评估数据(n=9 个机构,n=4 个机构)。使用描述性统计方法评估了计划、学员、教师和 SIMPL 手术评估的特征。
85 名主治医生和 86 名学员完成了 2457 例手术,总计完成了 4615 次独特的手术评估评分。主治医生在 52%的评估中包含了口头反馈。与初级住院医师相比,高级住院医师接受的评估更多(住院医师 1-3 年,n=439;住院医师 4-5 年,n=551)。对于住院医师和研究员两个队列,绩效评估显示从初级到高级学员的评分均有所提高,“准备好表现”或“表现出色”的评分从住院医师 1 年到 5 年提高了近两倍(住院医师 1 年,28.1%;住院医师 5 年,40.6%),从第一年到第二年研究员(研究员 6 年,46.7%;研究员 7 年,60.3%)。随着培训的进行,自主能力也表现出类似的提高。与初级住院医师相比,高级住院医师更频繁地获得“仅监督”自主权(住院医师 1 年,8.7%;住院医师 5 年,21.6%)。“仅监督”自主权评分授予 21.8%的即将毕业的研究员。评估数据显示,与初级研究员相比,高级研究员的复杂病例比例更高(研究员 6 年,20.9%;研究员 7 年,26.5%)。项目主任认为,教师和学员的参与是实施 SIMPL 评估应用程序的主要障碍。
这是首次描述 SIMPL 应用程序作为血管外科手术评估工具的情况,该应用程序已成功在住院医师和研究员计划中实施。评估数据显示,随着住院医师年资的增加,学员的自主性和表现以及病例的复杂性都在逐步提高。鉴于 SIMPL 被选为美国外科学会和血管外科学会委托专业活动评估的评估平台,了解使用该应用程序实施基于工作场所评估的促进因素和障碍至关重要,特别是随着我们向基于能力的医学教育迈进。