Surber Tyler, Huff Mark J, Hajnal Alen
School of Psychology, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2025 Jun;128(3):2021-2054. doi: 10.1177/00332941231174393. Epub 2023 May 10.
The present study investigated differences in priming perceptions of target objects via affordance or semantic primes. Affordances denote possibilities for action in relation to objects (e.g., chair - sit), whereas semantic primes describe related concepts and features of objects (e.g., chair - legs). In Experiments 1A/1B the effects of affordance and semantic priming were compared via a semantic-categorization task using a normed word list of objects. In Experiments 2-4 we investigated affordance priming on object identification of pictures using a shoebox-classification task. In Experiment 1A participants were asked to respond by categorizing the presented word as concrete or abstract. Experiment 1B was similar to 1A, but with a 1000 ms response deadline. Experiment 2 presented target objects as words or photographs. Experiment 3 presented target objects as photographs degraded at three levels (clear, medium blur, extreme blur). Experiment 4 presented target objects as photographs that began degraded and slowly became clear. Experiment 1B found word priming for semantic primes, but not affordances. In contrast, Experiments 2-4 found object priming was facilitated by both affordances and semantic primes. Collectively, our results indicate that affordances facilitate object classification.
本研究调查了通过可供性或语义启动对目标物体的启动感知差异。可供性表示与物体相关的行动可能性(例如,椅子 - 坐),而语义启动则描述物体的相关概念和特征(例如,椅子 - 腿)。在实验1A/1B中,通过使用标准化物体单词列表的语义分类任务比较了可供性和语义启动的效果。在实验2 - 4中,我们使用鞋盒分类任务研究了可供性启动对图片物体识别的影响。在实验1A中,要求参与者通过将呈现的单词分类为具体或抽象来做出反应。实验1B与实验1A相似,但有1000毫秒的反应截止时间。实验2将目标物体呈现为单词或照片。实验3将目标物体呈现为在三个级别(清晰、中度模糊、极度模糊)退化的照片。实验4将目标物体呈现为开始退化并逐渐变清晰的照片。实验1B发现语义启动存在单词启动效应,但可供性不存在。相比之下,实验2 - 4发现可供性和语义启动都促进了物体启动。总体而言,我们的结果表明可供性促进了物体分类。