Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA
RNA. 2023 Aug;29(8):1230-1242. doi: 10.1261/rna.079608.123. Epub 2023 May 11.
RNA binding proteins (RBPs) perform a myriad of functions and are implicated in numerous neurological diseases. To identify the targets of RBPs in small numbers of cells, we developed TRIBE, in which the catalytic domain of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR (ADARcd) is fused to an RBP. When the RBP binds to an mRNA, ADAR catalyzes A to G modifications in the target mRNA that can be easily identified in standard RNA sequencing. In STAMP, the concept is the same except the ADARcd is replaced by the RNA editing enzyme APOBEC. Here we compared TRIBE and STAMP side-by-side in human and cells. The goal is to learn the pros and cons of each method so that researchers can choose the method best suited to their RBP and system. In human cells, TRIBE and STAMP were performed using the RBP TDP-43. Although they both identified TDP-43 target mRNAs, combining the two methods more successfully identified high-confidence targets. In cells, RBP-APOBEC fusions generated only low numbers of editing sites, comparable to the level of control editing. This was true for two different RBPs, Hrp48 and Thor ( EIF4E-BP), indicating that STAMP does not work well in .
RNA 结合蛋白(RBPs)具有多种功能,与许多神经疾病有关。为了在少量细胞中鉴定 RBPs 的靶标,我们开发了 TRIBE,其中 RNA 编辑酶 ADAR(ADARcd)的催化结构域与 RBP 融合。当 RBP 结合到 mRNA 上时,ADAR 在靶 mRNA 上催化 A 到 G 的修饰,这些修饰可以在标准 RNA 测序中轻松识别。在 STAMP 中,概念是相同的,只是 ADARcd 被 RNA 编辑酶 APOBEC 取代。在这里,我们在人和 细胞中并排比较了 TRIBE 和 STAMP。目的是了解每种方法的优缺点,以便研究人员可以选择最适合其 RBP 和系统的方法。在人细胞中,使用 RBP TDP-43 进行了 TRIBE 和 STAMP。尽管它们都鉴定了 TDP-43 的靶标 mRNA,但将两种方法结合使用可以更成功地鉴定高可信度的靶标。在 细胞中,RBP-APOBEC 融合仅产生数量较少的编辑位点,与对照编辑水平相当。对于两种不同的 RBPs(Hrp48 和 Thor(EIF4E-BP))都是如此,这表明 STAMP 在 中效果不佳。