Jeschke Erika Ann, Baker Jay B, Wyma-Bradley Jared, Dorsch John, Huffman Sarah L
J Spec Oper Med. 2023 Oct 5;23(3):58-62. doi: 10.55460/2W3U-2XHB.
This will be the second in a series of nine articles in which we discuss findings from our ethnographic study entitled "The Impact of Catastrophic Injury Exposure on Resilience in Special Operations Surgical Teams." Our goal in this article is to establish the practical importance of redefining resilience within a strategic framework. Our bottom-up approach to strategy development explores unconventional resilience as an integrated transformational process that promotes change-agency through the force of movement. Synthesis of empirical data derived from participant interviews and focus groups highlights conceptual attributes that make up the essential components of this framework. To achieve our goal, the authors (1) briefly remind readers how we have problematized conventional resilience; (2) explain how we analyzed qualitative quotes to extrapolate our definition of unconventional resilience; and (3) describe in detail our strategic framework. We conclude by gesturing to why this strategic framework is applicable to practical performance of all Special Operation Forces (SOF) medics.
这将是系列九篇文章中的第二篇,我们将在这些文章中讨论我们的人种学研究结果,该研究名为“灾难性伤害暴露对特种作战外科团队恢复力的影响”。本文的目标是确立在战略框架内重新定义恢复力的实际重要性。我们自下而上的战略制定方法将非常规恢复力视为一个综合的转型过程,该过程通过行动的力量促进变革能动性。对来自参与者访谈和焦点小组的实证数据进行综合分析,突出了构成该框架基本组成部分的概念属性。为实现我们的目标,作者们(1)简要提醒读者我们是如何对传统恢复力提出质疑的;(2)解释我们如何分析定性引语以推断出我们对非常规恢复力的定义;(3)详细描述我们的战略框架。我们最后指出为什么这个战略框架适用于所有特种作战部队(SOF)医护人员的实际表现。