From the Department of Anaesthesiology (XZ, XH, ZZ, LXM, JS), Operating Room Nursing Department (QX) and Post Anaesthesia Care Unit Nursing (AM), 1st affiliated hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jul 1;40(7):521-528. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001846. Epub 2023 May 12.
Mask ventilation during anaesthesia induction is generally used to provide adequate oxygenation but improper mask ventilation can result in gastric insufflation. It has been reported that oxygen administered by transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) during anaesthesia induction can maintain oxygenation but its effect on gastric insufflation is unknown.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether THRIVE provided adequate oxygenation without gastric insufflation. The secondary aim was to explore the change in cross-sectional area of the antrum (CSAa) during anaesthesia induction. Other potential risk factors of gastric insufflation were also explored.
A prospective, randomised, double-blind study.
Single centre, Department of Anaesthesiology, 1 st Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, China, from May 2022 to September 2022.
A total of 210 patients (age >18 years, ASA classification I to III) scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia were enrolled.
For induction of general anaesthesia, patients were randomised into two groups: THRIVE and pressure-controlled facemask ventilation (PCFV). The THRIVE group received high-flow nasal oxygen with no additional ventilation. The PCFV group had pressure-controlled positive pressure ventilation from the anaesthesia machine via a tight fitting facemask. Gastric insufflation was detected using real-time ultrasonography. The CSAa was measured from ultrasonography images obtained before anaesthesia induction and at 0, 1, 2 and 3 min after loss of consciousness.
The incidence of gastric insufflation during the period from loss of consciousness until intubation.
The THRIVE group had a lower incidence of gastric insufflation during anaesthesia induction than the PCFV group (13.0 vs. 35.3%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14 to 0.56, P < 0.001). Increase in the CSA after anaesthesia induction was significantly correlated with gastric insufflation (OR = 5.35, 95% CI, 2.90 to 9.89, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that advancing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.07), obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OR = 2.43, 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.76), higher Mallampati score (OR = 2.66, 95% CI, 1.21 to 5.85) and PCFV (OR = 4.78, 95% CI, 2.06 to 11.06) were important independent risk factors for gastric insufflation.
During anaesthesia induction, the THRIVE technique provided adequate oxygenation with a reduced incidence of gastric insufflation. PCFV, advancing age, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and the Mallampati score were found to be independent risk factors for gastric insufflation during anaesthesia induction.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR200059555.
麻醉诱导期间通常使用面罩通气来提供足够的氧合,但不当的面罩通气可能导致胃充气。有报道称,麻醉诱导期间经鼻给予湿化高流量快速充气交换(THRIVE)的氧气可以维持氧合,但对胃充气的影响尚不清楚。
本研究的主要目的是评估 THRIVE 是否在不引起胃充气的情况下提供足够的氧合。次要目的是探讨麻醉诱导期间胃窦横截面积(CSAa)的变化。还探讨了其他潜在的胃充气危险因素。
前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
中国温州医科大学附属第一医院麻醉科,2022 年 5 月至 2022 年 9 月。
共纳入 210 例(年龄>18 岁,ASA 分级 I 至 III)拟行全身麻醉的患者。
全身麻醉诱导时,患者随机分为 THRIVE 组和压力控制面罩通气(PCFV)组。THRIVE 组接受高流量鼻氧,无需额外通气。PCFV 组通过密闭面罩从麻醉机进行压力控制正压通气。使用实时超声检测胃充气。在麻醉诱导前和意识丧失后 0、1、2 和 3 分钟测量 CSAa。
从意识丧失到插管期间胃充气的发生率。
THRIVE 组麻醉诱导期间胃充气的发生率低于 PCFV 组(13.0% vs. 35.3%,比值比(OR)=0.27,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.14 至 0.56,P<0.001)。麻醉诱导后 CSAa 的增加与胃充气显著相关(OR=5.35,95%CI,2.90 至 9.89,P<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄增长(OR=1.04,95%CI,1.01 至 1.07)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OR=2.43,95%CI,1.24 至 4.76)、较高的 Mallampati 评分(OR=2.66,95%CI,1.21 至 5.85)和 PCFV(OR=4.78,95%CI,2.06 至 11.06)是胃充气的重要独立危险因素。
在麻醉诱导期间,THRIVE 技术提供了足够的氧合,同时降低了胃充气的发生率。PCFV、年龄增长、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征和 Mallampati 评分被发现是麻醉诱导期间胃充气的独立危险因素。
中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR200059555。