Suppr超能文献

以组织学分期为参考标准,比较二维和点剪切波弹性成像技术在评估肝纤维化中的应用:一项前瞻性初步研究。

Comparison between Two-Dimensional and Point Shear Wave Elastography Techniques in Evaluating Liver Fibrosis Using Histological Staging as the Reference Standard: A Prospective Pilot Study.

作者信息

Lee Sang Min, Ha Hong Il, Lee In Jae, Lee Kwanseop, Lee Jung Woo, Park Ji Won, Kim Sung-Eun, Kwon Mi Jung, Choe Ji-Young, Yoon Sam-Youl, Yeo Seung-Gu, Kim Min-Jeong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, CHA University Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 7;13(9):1646. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091646.

Abstract

Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis is essential to prevent liver-related morbidity and mortality. Although various types of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) have been used and validated, there are limited studies on the relatively newer technique, two-dimensional SWE (2D-SWE). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of 2D-SWE and point SWE (p-SWE) for evaluating liver fibrosis using histology as the reference standard. To measure liver stiffness (LS) values, 87 patients underwent 2D-SWE and p-SWE using the same machine. Technical failures and unreliable measurements were also evaluated. The diagnostic performances of 2D-SWE and p-SWE were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis. No technical failures were observed in either method; however, unreliable measurements were less frequent in 2D-SWE (1/87 [1.1%]) than in p-SWE (8/87 [9.2%]) ( < 0.001). The AUROC of the LS values of 2D-SWE were significantly higher than those of p-SWE for diagnosing significant fibrosis (0.965 vs. 0.872, = 0.022) and cirrhosis (0.994 vs. 0.886, = 0.042). In conclusion, 2D-SWE is more reliable and accurate than p-SWE for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis.

摘要

评估肝纤维化对于预防肝脏相关的发病率和死亡率至关重要。尽管各种类型的超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)已被使用并得到验证,但对于相对较新的技术——二维SWE(2D-SWE)的研究却很有限。因此,本研究旨在以组织学为参考标准,比较2D-SWE和点剪切波弹性成像(p-SWE)评估肝纤维化的诊断性能。为测量肝脏硬度(LS)值,87例患者使用同一台机器接受了2D-SWE和p-SWE检查。还对技术故障和不可靠测量进行了评估。使用受试者操作特征(AUROC)曲线分析比较了2D-SWE和p-SWE的诊断性能。两种方法均未观察到技术故障;然而,2D-SWE中不可靠测量的发生率(1/87 [1.1%])低于p-SWE(8/87 [9.2%])(<0.001)。2D-SWE的LS值在诊断显著纤维化(0.965对0.872,P = 0.022)和肝硬化(0.994对0.886,P = 0.042)方面的AUROC显著高于p-SWE。总之,在诊断肝纤维化方面,2D-SWE比p-SWE更可靠、更准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b96/10178401/f455e728ab3d/diagnostics-13-01646-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验