Suppr超能文献

聚乳酸、树脂和硅胶制成的种植体模型准确性的比较验证

Comparative Verification of the Accuracy of Implant Models Made of PLA, Resin, and Silicone.

作者信息

Wakamori Kana, Nagata Koudai, Nakashizu Toshifumi, Tsuruoka Hayato, Atsumi Mihoko, Kawana Hiromasa

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.

Division of the Dental Practice Support, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;16(9):3307. doi: 10.3390/ma16093307.

Abstract

Polylactic acid (PLA) has gained considerable attention as an alternative to petroleum-based materials due to environmental concerns. We fabricated implant models with fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers using PLA, and the accuracies of these PLA models were compared with those of plaster models made from silicone impressions and resin models made with digital light processing (DLP). A base model was obtained from an impact-training model. The scan body was mounted on the plaster, resin, and PLA models obtained from the base model, and the obtained information was converted to stereolithography (STL) data by the 3D scanner. The base model was then used as a reference, and its data were superimposed onto the STL data of each model using Geomagic control. The horizontal and vertical accuracies of PLA models, as calculated using the Tukey-Kramer method, were 97.2 ± 48.4 and 115.5 ± 15.1 μm, respectively, which suggests that the PLA model is the least accurate among the three models. In both cases, significant differences were found between PLA and gypsum and between the PLA and resin models. However, considering that the misfit of screw-retained implant frames should be ≤150 µm, PLA can be effectively used for fabricating implant models.

摘要

由于环境问题,聚乳酸(PLA)作为石油基材料的替代品受到了广泛关注。我们使用PLA通过熔融沉积成型(FFF)3D打印机制作了种植体模型,并将这些PLA模型的精度与由硅橡胶印模制成的石膏模型以及用数字光处理(DLP)制作的树脂模型的精度进行了比较。基础模型取自一个冲击训练模型。将扫描体安装在从基础模型获得的石膏、树脂和PLA模型上,然后通过3D扫描仪将获得的信息转换为立体光刻(STL)数据。然后将基础模型用作参考,并使用Geomagic control将其数据叠加到每个模型的STL数据上。使用Tukey-Kramer方法计算得出,PLA模型的水平和垂直精度分别为97.2±48.4μm和115.5±15.1μm,这表明PLA模型是这三种模型中精度最低的。在这两种情况下,PLA与石膏模型之间以及PLA与树脂模型之间均存在显著差异。然而,考虑到螺丝固位种植体框架的不匹配度应≤150μm,PLA可有效地用于制作种植体模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e4e/10179293/9cd39e9eb7ef/materials-16-03307-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验