Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
German Migraine and Headache Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
Cephalalgia. 2023 May;43(5):3331024231174855. doi: 10.1177/03331024231174855.
Most migraine patients need an effective acute medication. Real-world data can provide important information on the performance of acute migraine medication in clinical practice.
We used data from the German Migraine and Headache Society Headache Registry, where patients rate efficacy and tolerability of and satisfaction with each of their acute headache medications.
A total of 1756 adult migraine patients (females: 85%, age: 39.5 ± 12.8 years, headache days per month: 13.5 ± 8.1) were included. Of these, 93% used acute medication, most frequently triptans (59.3%) and/or non-opioid analgesics (56.4%), and 58.5% rated efficacy as good or very good. This was more frequent for triptans (75.4%) than for non-opioid analgesics (43.6%, p < 0.001). Among non-opioid analgesics, naproxen was rated most effective (61.9% very good or good, p < 0.001 compared to ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol). Patient-rated efficacy significantly declined with higher headache frequencies (p < 0.001), and this effect remained significant after omitting patients overusing acute medication.
In the present population recruited at specialized headache centers, patients rated triptans as more effective than non-opioid analgesics, naproxen as more effective than ibuprofen, and acute medication efficacy decreased with increasing headache frequency.Trial registration: The German Migraine and Headache Society Headache Registry is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00021081).
大多数偏头痛患者需要有效的急性治疗药物。真实世界数据可为急性偏头痛治疗药物在临床实践中的表现提供重要信息。
我们使用了德国偏头痛和头痛学会头痛登记处的数据,患者在该登记处对每种急性头痛治疗药物的疗效、耐受性和满意度进行评分。
共纳入 1756 例成年偏头痛患者(女性占 85%,年龄为 39.5±12.8 岁,每月头痛天数为 13.5±8.1)。其中 93%的患者使用了急性治疗药物,最常使用的是曲普坦类(59.3%)和/或非阿片类镇痛药(56.4%),58.5%的患者认为疗效良好或非常好。曲普坦类的这一比例(75.4%)明显高于非阿片类镇痛药(43.6%,p<0.001)。在非阿片类镇痛药中,萘普生的疗效评价最高(61.9%的患者认为非常好或好,与布洛芬、乙酰水杨酸和扑热息痛相比,p<0.001)。患者自评疗效随头痛频率的增加而显著下降(p<0.001),而且这种影响在剔除过度使用急性治疗药物的患者后仍然显著。
在本次在专门的头痛中心招募的人群中,患者认为曲普坦类比非阿片类镇痛药更有效,萘普生比布洛芬更有效,且急性治疗药物的疗效随头痛频率的增加而降低。
德国偏头痛和头痛学会头痛登记处已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS 00021081)注册。