Tsai Pei-Chung, Cheng Ming-Hui, Peng Bo-Hsun, Jou Jwo-Huei, Cheng Yun-Hsin, Ku Yi-Chen, Chiu Hsin-Ya, Chou Ming-Li, Yeh Po-Ting
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Shu-Guang Girls' Senior High School, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 24;9(5):e15522. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15522. eCollection 2023 May.
Projectors have become one major medium in modern teaching, with large area-size displays emerging as an alternative. What concerns the general public is whether such eLearning would impose threat on eyes, by noting blue enriched white light to be hazardous to retina and else. Especially, little was known about their permissible viewing time under a certain viewing clarity. We had hence carried out a quantitative study with the use of a blue-hazard quantification spectrometer to determine the permissible viewing time when using a projector and a large size TV screen for displaying. Surprisingly, the large TV screen could permit a much longer viewing time, meaning which is more eye-friendly. It is plausibly because its resolution is much higher than that of the projector. Two dilemmas were observed in such eLearning; those sitting in the front would suffer a much higher illuminance, leading to a much shorter viewing time, while those sitting in the back would need a far much larger font size to see clearly. To ensure both viewing clarity and a sufficiently long permissible viewing time, orange text on black background is suggested to replace the defaulted black text on white background. The permissible viewing time could hence drastically increase from 1.3 to 83 h at 2 m by viewing a 30 pt font for the TV and from 0.4 to 54 h for the projection. At 6 m, the permissible viewing time was increased from 12 to 236 h for the TV and from 3 to 160 h for the projection, based on a viewable 94 pt font. These results may help educators and other e-display users to wisely apply the display tools with safety.
投影仪已成为现代教学中的一种主要媒介,大面积显示屏也逐渐成为一种替代选择。公众关心的是,这种电子学习方式是否会对眼睛造成威胁,因为蓝光丰富的白光被认为对视网膜等有害。特别是,在一定的观看清晰度下,人们对其允许的观看时间知之甚少。因此,我们使用蓝光危害量化光谱仪进行了一项定量研究,以确定使用投影仪和大尺寸电视屏幕进行显示时的允许观看时间。令人惊讶的是,大尺寸电视屏幕允许的观看时间长得多,这意味着它对眼睛更友好。这可能是因为它的分辨率比投影仪高得多。在这种电子学习中观察到了两个困境;坐在前面的人会受到更高的照度,导致观看时间短得多,而坐在后面的人则需要大得多的字体才能看清。为了确保观看清晰度和足够长的允许观看时间,建议用黑底橙字取代默认的白底黑字。通过观看电视上30磅字体,在2米处允许观看时间可从1.3小时大幅增加到83小时,投影仪则从0.4小时增加到54小时。在6米处,基于94磅可观看字体,电视的允许观看时间从12小时增加到236小时,投影仪从3小时增加到160小时。这些结果可能有助于教育工作者和其他电子显示屏用户安全地明智应用显示工具。