Long-Term Effectiveness of Ear Molding and Factors Affecting Outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The EarWell System offers a correction opportunity for infants born with ear anomalies. However, the long-term effectiveness of ear molding remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the long-term effectiveness of this novel technique and to determine the risk factors for recurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective, population-based cohort study was performed from 2017 through 2021. Infants who completed ear molding therapy and were followed up for longer than 6 months were enrolled. The main outcomes were immediate and long-term efficacy, which were graded by two blinded plastic surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 226 infants (334 ears) were recruited. The most common anomalies were helical deformities [113 ears (33.8%)], and the rarest were cryptotia [five ears (1.5%)] and conchal crus [five ears (1.5%)]. The age at initiation of treatment was a factor affecting both immediate ( P = 0.004) and long-term effectiveness ( P = 0.009). The type of anomaly also influenced long-term molding outcomes. For cup ears, the success rate of long-term outcomes (76.0%) was significantly lower than that of immediate outcomes (98.7%) ( P < 0.001). Prominent ear, cup ear, and microtia were found to be the most likely to relapse during long-term follow-up. The results of logistic regression also demonstrated age, duration time, and the type of anomaly to be risk factors of ear molding effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The EarWell System was shown to be a secure and effective method for treatment of congenital ear anomalies. Some infants' ear anomalies recurred after successful immediate results. The age at initiation of treatment and the type of anomaly were predictors of long-term outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.