School of Medicine, Toho University, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e063639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639.
To evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors.
The quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011-2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A questionnaire survey targeting CPG development groups was conducted through postal mail.
405 CPGs were retrieved from a Japanese CPG clearinghouse. Questionnaires were distributed to the 405 CPG development groups. Of the 178 respondents, 22 were excluded because of missing values. Finally, 156 participants representing their CPG development groups were included in the analysis.
CPG quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. The characteristics of CPGs, including publication year, development organisation, versions, number of members in the development group and involvement of methodological experts, were corrected from the description in the CPGs and the questionnaire survey. We performed multiple logistic regressions using the quality of CPGs as the dependent variable and the involvement of experts as the independent variable, adjusting for other possible factors.
A total of 156 CPGs were included. Expert involvement was significantly associated with the AGREE II instrument scores in domains 1 (β=0.207), 2 (β=0.370), 3 (β=0.413), 4 (β=0.289), 5 (β=0.375), 6 (β=0.240) and overall (β=0.344).
This study revealed that the involvement of methodological experts in the CPG development process improves the quality of CPGs. The results suggest the importance of establishing a training and certification programme for experts and constructing expert referral systems that meet CPG developers' needs to improve the quality of CPGs.
在调整其他因素后,评估方法学专家的参与是否能提高临床实践指南(CPG)的质量。
使用评估、制定和评价指南(AGREE II)工具评估 2011-2019 年期间在日本发表的 CPG 的质量。通过邮寄向 CPG 制定小组开展问卷调查。
从日本 CPG 知识库中检索到 405 份 CPG。向 405 个 CPG 制定小组分发了问卷。在 178 名回复者中,有 22 名因存在缺失值而被排除。最终,有 156 名代表其 CPG 制定小组的参与者被纳入分析。
使用 AGREE II 工具评估 CPG 质量。CPG 的特征,包括出版年份、制定组织、版本、制定小组成员人数以及方法学专家的参与情况,是从 CPG 描述和问卷调查中纠正而来的。我们使用 CPG 质量作为因变量,专家参与作为自变量,进行了多项逻辑回归分析,同时调整了其他可能的因素。
共纳入 156 份 CPG。专家参与与 AGREE II 工具在领域 1(β=0.207)、2(β=0.370)、3(β=0.413)、4(β=0.289)、5(β=0.375)、6(β=0.240)和总体(β=0.344)的得分显著相关。
本研究表明,方法学专家参与 CPG 制定过程可提高 CPG 的质量。结果提示建立专家培训和认证计划以及构建满足 CPG 制定者需求的专家推荐系统的重要性,以提高 CPG 的质量。