• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Marginal Bone Loss Compared in Internal and External Implant Connections: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Years Follow-Up.内连接与外连接种植体的边缘骨吸收比较:6年随访的回顾性临床研究
Biomedicines. 2023 Apr 8;11(4):1128. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041128.
2
Influence of Connections and Surfaces of Dental Implants on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study Over 7 to 19 Years.种植体的连接和表面对边缘骨丧失的影响:一项长达 7 至 19 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):1195-1202. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8450.
3
Clinical and radiological outcomes of implants with two different connection configurations: A randomised controlled trial.种植体两种不同连接方式的临床和影像学效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(4):355-368.
4
Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.种植体-基台连接类型对牙种植体边缘骨吸收和存留率的长期影响。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Dec;52(6):496-508. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2200960048. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
A 3-Year Prospective Study on Radiographic Marginal Bone Evaluation Around Platform-Shifting Implants with Internal Conical Connections.一项关于具有内部锥形连接的平台转移种植体周围放射学边缘骨评估的 3 年前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 May-Jun;36(3):574-580. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8425.
6
Evaluation of marginal bone loss of dental implants with internal or external connections and its association with other variables: A systematic review.具有内连接或外连接的牙种植体边缘骨吸收评估及其与其他变量的关联:一项系统评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Oct;116(4):501-506.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.027. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study.大直径种植体上的平台转换修复体:一项5年的临床前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):103-9.
8
Evaluation of internal and external hexagon connections in immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations: A within-person randomized split-mouth controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up.即刻负载全口修复中内、外六角连接的评估:一项 3 年随访的个体内随机分口对照试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Aug;23(4):562-567. doi: 10.1111/cid.13029. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
9
Sealing effectiveness against Staphylococcus aureus of five different implant-abutment connections.五种不同种植体-基台连接对金黄色葡萄球菌的封闭效果
Am J Dent. 2018 Jun;31(3):141-143.
10
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保存牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):361-72.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of prosthetic designs on peri-implant bone loss: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-analysis.修复体设计对种植体周围骨吸收的影响:一项AO/AAP系统评价与Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):634-651. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0144. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Conservative and cost-effective rehabilitation of a deep bite patient with worn dentition: A case report of the Dahl technique approach.牙列磨损深覆合患者的保守且经济高效的康复治疗:Dahl技术方法的病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Oct 17;11(10):e8058. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8058. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Thermodynamic Consideration of the Solid Saponin Extract Drop-Air System.固-空气体系中皂苷提取物液滴的热力学考虑。
Molecules. 2023 Jun 23;28(13):4943. doi: 10.3390/molecules28134943.
4
Green Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Surface-Decorated Nanoparticles of FeO with Au and Ag: Study of the Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity.绿色超声辅助合成具有金和银表面修饰的FeO纳米颗粒:抗真菌和抗菌活性研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jun 1;14(6):304. doi: 10.3390/jfb14060304.

本文引用的文献

1
Dental Implant and Natural Tooth Micro-Movements during Mastication-In Vivo Study with 3D VIC Method.使用三维数字图像相关法进行的体内研究:咀嚼过程中种植牙与天然牙的微运动
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):1690. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101690.
2
Dental Implants: Enhancing Biological Response Through Surface Modifications.种植牙:通过表面改性增强生物响应。
Dent Clin North Am. 2022 Oct;66(4):627-642. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
3
Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面处的细菌微渗漏:一项体外研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;9(7):277. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070277.
4
Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review.当代口腔种植体骨整合概念:综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 14;2022:6170452. doi: 10.1155/2022/6170452. eCollection 2022.
5
Biological mechanisms underlying complications related to implant site preparation.种植位点预备相关并发症的生物学机制。
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/prd.12410.
6
Comparison of external, internal flat-to-flat, and conical implant abutment connections for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.种植体支持修复体的外部、内部平面到平面以及锥形种植体基台连接的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):327-340. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
7
Comparison of the Morse Cone Connection with the Internal Hexagon and External Hexagon Connections Based on Microleakage - Review.基于微渗漏的莫氏锥度连接与内六角和外六角连接的比较——综述
Prague Med Rep. 2021;122(3):181-190. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2021.15.
8
How to consider implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in elderly patients: a narrative review.如何考虑老年患者的种植修复:叙述性综述。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4 Suppl. 1):119-126. doi: 10.23812/21-4supp1-11.
9
Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.纯氧化锆与金属-丙烯酸酯义齿修复无牙颌:一项为期 2 年的回顾性临床研究。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. doi: 10.23812/21-4supp1-9.
10
Comparison of hygiene levels in metal-ceramic and stratified zirconia in prosthetic rehabilitation on teeth and implants: a retrospective clinical study of a three-year follow-up.金属陶瓷和分层氧化锆修复体在牙列和种植体修复中的卫生水平比较:一项为期三年的回顾性临床研究。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4 Suppl. 1):41-49. doi: 10.23812/21-4supp1-4.

内连接与外连接种植体的边缘骨吸收比较:6年随访的回顾性临床研究

Marginal Bone Loss Compared in Internal and External Implant Connections: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Years Follow-Up.

作者信息

D'Orto Bianca, Chiavenna Carlo, Leone Renato, Longoni Martina, Nagni Matteo, Capparè Paolo

机构信息

Dental School, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, "Federico II" University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2023 Apr 8;11(4):1128. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041128.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines11041128
PMID:37189746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10136276/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the marginal bone loss between two different categories of implants (Winsix, Biosafin, Ancona, Italy) having the same diameter and belonging to the Torque Type (TT) line, in the internal hexagon version (TTi, Group A) and in the external hexagon configuration (TTx, Group B). Patients with one or more straight implants (insertion parallel to the occlusal plane) in the molar and premolar regions in association with tooth extraction at least 4 months prior to implant insertion, who have a fixture diameter of 3.8 mm, who followed up for at least 6 years, and whose radiographic records were available were enrolled in this study. Depending on implant connections (externally or internally), the sample was divided into groups A and B. For externally connected implants (66), the marginal resorption was 1.1 ± 0.17 mm. The subgroup of single and bridge implants showed no statistically significant differences with a marginal bone resorption of 1.07 ± 0.15 mm and 1.1 ± 0.17 mm, respectively. Internally connected implants (69) showed an overall marginal resorption of 0.91 ± 0.17 mm, while the subgroup of single and bridge implants showed resorption of 0.90 ± 0.19 mm and 0.90 ± 0.17 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. According to the obtained results, internally connected implants showed less marginal bone resorption than externally connected implants.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估和比较两种不同类别的种植体(意大利安科纳的Winsix、Biosafin)之间的边缘骨吸收情况,这两种种植体直径相同,属于扭矩型(TT)系列,分别为内六角型(TTi,A组)和外六角型(TTx,B组)。本研究纳入了在磨牙和前磨牙区域有一个或多个直形种植体(种植体植入方向与咬合平面平行)、在种植体植入前至少4个月已拔牙、种植体直径为3.8 mm、随访至少6年且有影像学记录的患者。根据种植体连接方式(外部或内部),将样本分为A组和B组。对于外部连接的种植体(66颗),边缘吸收为1.1±0.17 mm。单颗种植体和桥体种植体亚组的边缘骨吸收分别为1.07±0.15 mm和1.1±0.17 mm,无统计学显著差异。内部连接的种植体(69颗)总体边缘吸收为0.91±0.17 mm,而单颗种植体和桥体种植体亚组的吸收分别为0.90±0.19 mm和0.90±0.17 mm,无统计学显著差异。根据所得结果,内部连接的种植体边缘骨吸收比外部连接的种植体少。