Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Sci Immunol. 2023 Oct 27;8(88):eadg7015. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adg7015.
Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants escape vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies and cause nearly all current COVID-19 cases. Here, we compared the efficacy of three booster vaccines against Omicron BA.5 challenge in rhesus macaques: mRNA-1273, the Novavax ancestral spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373), or Omicron BA.1 spike protein version (NVX-CoV2515). All three booster vaccines induced a strong BA.1 cross-reactive binding antibody and changed immunoglobulin G (Ig) dominance from IgG1 to IgG4 in the serum. All three booster vaccines also induced strong and comparable neutralizing antibody responses against multiple variants of concern, including BA.5 and BQ.1.1, along with long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow. The ratio of BA.1 to WA-1 spike-specific antibody-secreting cells in the blood was higher in NVX-CoV2515 animals compared with NVX-CoV2373 animals, suggesting a better recall of BA.1-specific memory B cells by the BA.1 spike-specific vaccine compared with the ancestral spike-specific vaccine. Further, all three booster vaccines induced low levels of spike-specific CD4 but not CD8 T cell responses in the blood. After challenge with SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 variant, all three vaccines showed strong protection in the lungs and controlled virus replication in the nasopharynx. In addition, both Novavax vaccines blunted viral replication in nasopharynx at day 2. The protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 infection in the upper respiratory airways correlated with binding, neutralizing, and ADNP activities of the serum antibody. These data have important implications for COVID-19 vaccine development, because vaccines that lower nasopharyngeal virus may help to reduce transmission.
奥密克戎 SARS-CoV-2 变体逃避疫苗诱导的中和抗体,并导致几乎所有当前的 COVID-19 病例。在这里,我们比较了三种加强疫苗在恒河猴中针对奥密克戎 BA.5 挑战的功效:mRNA-1273、Novavax 原始刺突蛋白疫苗(NVX-CoV2373)或奥密克戎 BA.1 刺突蛋白版本(NVX-CoV2515)。这三种加强疫苗都诱导了强烈的 BA.1 交叉反应性结合抗体,并使血清中的免疫球蛋白 G(Ig)从 IgG1 转变为 IgG4。这三种加强疫苗还诱导了针对多个关注变体的强烈且可比的中和抗体反应,包括 BA.5 和 BQ.1.1,以及骨髓中的长寿浆细胞。与 NVX-CoV2373 动物相比,NVX-CoV2515 动物血液中 BA.1 与 WA-1 刺突特异性抗体分泌细胞的比例更高,这表明 BA.1 特异性疫苗比原始刺突特异性疫苗更好地召回 BA.1 特异性记忆 B 细胞。此外,这三种加强疫苗都在血液中诱导了低水平的刺突特异性 CD4,但没有 CD8 T 细胞反应。在 SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 变体挑战后,这三种疫苗都在肺部显示出强大的保护作用,并控制了鼻咽部的病毒复制。此外,两种 Novavax 疫苗都在第 2 天抑制了鼻咽部的病毒复制。在上呼吸道对 SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 感染的保护与血清抗体的结合、中和和 ADNP 活性相关。这些数据对 COVID-19 疫苗的开发具有重要意义,因为降低鼻咽部病毒的疫苗可能有助于减少传播。