Avera Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):109-117. doi: 10.1177/15562646231173745. Epub 2023 May 16.
The last decade has witnessed growing calls for the return of individual research results. Prior work in genetic studies has shown that individual, contextual, and cultural factors influence participants' preferences for individual research results. There is a gap in knowledge about participants' views about other types of results, specifically those lacking clinical significance. This study investigates the perspectives of 1587 mothers enrolled in the Northern Plains Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios to determine their perceived value of individual research results based on result type and the ability to interpret them within a normative context. Irrespective of the result type, participants attributed higher perceived value to results that were well understood than results of unknown significance.
过去十年,人们越来越呼吁将个体的研究结果返还给个人。遗传研究的前期工作表明,个体、情境和文化因素影响参与者对个体研究结果的偏好。目前,人们对参与者对其他类型结果(特别是缺乏临床意义的结果)的看法知之甚少。本研究调查了北方平原环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)计划中 1587 名母亲的观点。研究人员向参与者提供了假设情景,以根据结果类型和在规范背景下解释结果的能力,确定他们对个体研究结果的感知价值。无论结果类型如何,参与者都认为理解透彻的结果比意义不明的结果具有更高的感知价值。