Suppr超能文献

研究实践中跨学科性的概念与解读:来自数字转型新兴领域小组讨论的结果

Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation.

作者信息

Schmitt Josephine B, Goldmann Anne, Simon Samuel T, Bieber Christoph

机构信息

Center for Advanced Internet Studies, Bochum, Germany.

University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Minerva. 2023;61(2):199-220. doi: 10.1007/s11024-023-09489-w. Epub 2023 Feb 25.

Abstract

In recent years, we have been observing the phenomenon of an emerging scientific field: (DTR). Due to the diversity and complexity of its object of research digital, transformation is not effectively researchable if confined to the boundaries of individual disciplines. In the light of Scientific/Intellectual Movement theory (Frickel and Gross 2005), we wonder how interdisciplinarity could and should be mobilized to further advance the development of the field of DTR. To answer this question, we (a) need to understand how interdisciplinarity is conceived and (b) how it is considered in research practice by researchers in the emerging field. This is important, as scientists' application of interdisciplinarity will highly influence an emerging field, shape its growth, consolidation as well as its academic establishment. We conducted six group discussions with 26 researchers from different disciplines and career levels (PhD students, postdocs, professors). The discussions were studied with a structuring qualitative content analysis. The results reflect the vagueness of the concept of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity is largely conceived as multidisciplinarity. Further, the interviewees mentioned more challenges than opportunities when it comes to interdisciplinary DTR. The present study widens the scientific understanding about how researchers of different career levels perceive, learn, and practice interdisciplinarity in DTR. It further provides valuable indications of how interdisciplinary research in an emerging field can be profitably shaped for practice.

摘要

近年来,我们一直在关注一个新兴科学领域的现象:(数字技术转型)。由于其研究对象的多样性和复杂性,如果将数字技术转型局限于各个学科的边界内,就无法对其进行有效的研究。根据科学/知识运动理论(弗里克尔和格罗斯,2005年),我们想知道如何能够且应该调动跨学科性来进一步推动数字技术转型领域的发展。为了回答这个问题,我们(a)需要了解跨学科性是如何被构想的,以及(b)新兴领域的研究人员在研究实践中是如何看待它的。这很重要,因为科学家对跨学科性的应用将极大地影响一个新兴领域,塑造其发展、巩固以及学术地位。我们与来自不同学科和职业水平(博士生、博士后、教授)的26名研究人员进行了六次小组讨论。通过结构化定性内容分析对讨论进行了研究。结果反映了跨学科性概念的模糊性。跨学科性在很大程度上被视为多学科性。此外,在跨学科数字技术转型方面,受访者提到的挑战多于机遇。本研究拓宽了关于不同职业水平的研究人员如何在数字技术转型中理解、学习和实践跨学科性的科学认识。它还进一步提供了关于如何为实践有益地塑造新兴领域跨学科研究的宝贵指示。

相似文献

2
Speaking across boundaries to explore the potential for interdisciplinarity in ecosystem services knowledge production.
Conserv Biol. 2021 Aug;35(4):1198-1209. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13659. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Benefits and Challenges of Interdisciplinarity in CSCL Research: A View From the Literature.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:579986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579986. eCollection 2020.
5
Slow convergence: Career impediments to interdisciplinary biomedical research.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 6;121(32):e2402646121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2402646121. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Interdisciplinarity and the social sciences: capital, institutions and autonomy.
Br J Sociol. 2011 Dec;62(4):657-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01385.x.
7
Rethinking interdisciplinarity: Proposing a multilayered model.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 10;34:118. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.118. eCollection 2020.
8
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验