Cardiovascular Research, UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:10742484231169644. doi: 10.1177/10742484231169644.
Ticagrelor might reduce infarct size by exerting a more potent antiplatelet effect or by promoting a potential conditioning stimulus in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Pre-infarction angina (PIA) is an effective preconditioning stimulus that reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. Because little is known on the interaction of PIA in STEMI-patients loaded with ticagrelor, we sought to determine if patients loaded with ticagrelor had improved clinical outcomes as compared to clopidogrel and to study if it is modulated by the presence of PIA.
From 1272 STEMI patients submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor from January 2008 to December 2018, 826 were analyzed after propensity score matching. Infarct size was estimated using peak creatine kinase (CK) and troponin T (TnT), and clinical impact was evaluated through cumulative major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up. Matched patients and their interaction with PIA were analyzed.
Patients loaded with ticagrelor had lower peak CK [1405.50 U/L (730.25-2491.00), < .001] and TnT [3.58 ng/mL (1.73-6.59), < .001)], regardless of PIA. The presence of PIA was associated with lower CK ( = .030), but not TnT ( = .097). There was no interaction between ticagrelor loading and PIA ( = .788 for TnT and = .555 for CK). There was no difference in MACCE incidence between clopidogrel or ticagrelor loading ( = .129). Cumulative survival was also similar between clopidogrel or ticagrelor, regardless of PIA ( = .103).
Ticagrelor reduced infarct sizes independently and without a synergic effect with PIA. Despite reducing infarct size, clinical outcomes were similar across both groups.
替格瑞洛可能通过发挥更强的抗血小板作用或通过在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中促进潜在的预处理刺激来减小梗死面积。前梗死心绞痛(PIA)是一种有效的预处理刺激,可以减少缺血再灌注损伤。由于对于接受替格瑞洛负荷治疗的 STEMI 患者中 PIA 的相互作用知之甚少,我们试图确定与氯吡格雷相比,接受替格瑞洛负荷治疗的患者是否具有更好的临床结局,并研究它是否受 PIA 的存在所调节。
从 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,我们对 1272 例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 STEMI 患者进行了分析,其中 826 例患者在接受倾向性评分匹配后进行了分析。通过肌酸激酶峰值(CK)和肌钙蛋白 T(TnT)来估计梗死面积,并通过 1 年随访时累积的主要心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE)评估临床影响。分析了匹配患者及其与 PIA 的相互作用。
无论 PIA 情况如何,接受替格瑞洛负荷治疗的患者 CK 峰值[1405.50 U/L(730.25-2491.00),<.001]和 TnT 峰值[3.58 ng/mL(1.73-6.59),<.001]均较低。PIA 的存在与 CK 降低相关( =.030),但与 TnT 无关( =.097)。替格瑞洛负荷治疗与 PIA 之间没有相互作用( =.788 用于 TnT 和 =.555 用于 CK)。氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛负荷治疗的 MACCE 发生率之间没有差异( =.129)。无论 PIA 情况如何,氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛的累积生存率也相似( =.103)。
替格瑞洛独立于 PIA 并通过发挥更强的抗血小板作用来减小梗死面积。尽管减小了梗死面积,但两组的临床结局相似。