• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NT-proBNP水平下氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效:CCC-ACS项目分析

Efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor under NT-proBNP in hospitalized ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients on percutaneous coronary intervention: CCC-ACS Project Analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Xin, Ai Guannan, Qiu Miaohan, Wang Xiaozeng, Zhang Lei, Yang Xiaoxu, Liu Yifei, Xu Pei, Zhang Jiyuan, Gu Chonghuai, Zhou Mengge, Hao Yongchen, Zhao Dong, Han Yaling

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China.

Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China; Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.004
PMID:32307186
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification with specific biomarkers is proposed for tailored P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

This nationwide registry and quality improvement study is from November 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. In total, 11,512 STEMI patients received aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) and underwent PCIs in hospitals. Of the patients, 2992 were prescribed ticagrelor and 8520 clopidogrel. The primary effectiveness outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, in-hospital ischemic stroke). The primary safety outcome was in-hospital major bleeding.

RESULTS

MACCE incidence was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (0.8% versus 1.2%; P=0.046), but under different NT-proBNP levels, cumulative hazards of MACCE were without statistical significance. Bleeding rates were higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (all bleeding: 9.9% versus 6.9%, P<0.001; major bleeding: 4.0% versus 2.7%, P<0.001). The higher cumulative hazard of bleeding could be identified in the Kaplan-Meier curves. In the multivariate analysis, ticagrelor increased bleeding events, compared with clopidogrel, at NT-proBNP >1800 ng/L patients (all bleeding: HR 1.46; 95%CI, 1.07-2.01; major bleeding: HR 1.68, 95%CI, 1.03-2.74), but a low effect was found in those with lower NT-proBNP level. Subgroup analyses show that ticagrelor increased major bleeding in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.50 (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.61-6.74) (interaction p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

We found that ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, increased bleeding complications in hospitalized patients with NT-proBNP>1800 ng/L, especially in patients with EF < 0.50.

摘要

背景

对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,建议使用特定生物标志物进行危险分层,以制定个性化的P2Y12抑制剂治疗方案。

方法

这项全国性登记和质量改进研究的时间范围是2014年11月1日至2017年6月30日。共有11512例STEMI患者在医院接受了阿司匹林和P2Y12受体抑制剂(氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)治疗并接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。其中,2992例患者使用替格瑞洛,8520例使用氯吡格雷。主要有效性结局是主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE:心源性死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、院内缺血性卒中)。主要安全性结局是院内大出血。

结果

替格瑞洛组的MACCE发生率低于氯吡格雷组(0.8%对1.2%;P = 0.046),但在不同NT-proBNP水平下,MACCE的累积风险无统计学意义。替格瑞洛组的出血率高于氯吡格雷组(所有出血:9.9%对6.9%,P < 0.001;大出血:4.0%对2.7%,P < 0.001)。在Kaplan-Meier曲线中可以发现出血的累积风险更高。在多变量分析中,与氯吡格雷相比,NT-proBNP>1800 ng/L的患者使用替格瑞洛会增加出血事件(所有出血:HR 1.46;95%CI,1.07 - 2.01;大出血:HR 1.68,95%CI,1.03 - 2.74),但在NT-proBNP水平较低的患者中影响较小。亚组分析表明,替格瑞洛会增加左心室射血分数(LVEF)<0.50的患者的大出血风险(HR 3.29;95%CI 1.61 - 6.74)(交互作用p = 0.03)。

结论

我们发现,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛会增加NT-proBNP>1800 ng/L的住院患者的出血并发症,尤其是LVEF < 0.50的患者。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor under NT-proBNP in hospitalized ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients on percutaneous coronary intervention: CCC-ACS Project Analysis.NT-proBNP水平下氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效:CCC-ACS项目分析
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
In-hospital outcomes of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in high bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: Findings from the CCC-ACS project.高出血风险急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的院内结局:CCC-ACS 项目研究结果。
Thromb Res. 2022 Aug;216:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效评估
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;68(2):115-20. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000390.
4
Real-world bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in England: a population-based cohort study emulating a 'target trial'.在英国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 患者的真实世界出血情况:一项基于人群的队列研究模拟“目标试验”。
Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001999.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor in Comparison to Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效和安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e012530. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012530. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Triple Therapy With Ticagrelor or Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷三联疗法与氯吡格雷用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的安全性和疗效。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;26(6):625-629. doi: 10.1177/10742484211031436. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
7
Beneficial effect of ticagrelor on microvascular perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替格瑞洛对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者微血管灌注的有益作用。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Aug;30(5):317-322. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000707.
8
Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.036.
9
Comparison of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in anemic patients with acute coronary syndrome: efficacy and safety outcomes over one year.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在伴有贫血的急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较:一年以上的疗效和安全性结局。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 May;80(5):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03653-1. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Fewer gastrointestinal bleeds with ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention.与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠脉综合征患者的胃肠道出血。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;52(4):646-654. doi: 10.1111/apt.15790. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in treating acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛治疗接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26553. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26553. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
2
The Management and Antithrombotic Strategies of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and High Bleeding Risk.《冠心病合并高出血风险患者的管理与抗栓策略》
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01893-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Risk of bleeding with ticagrelor in elderly patients over 75 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
替格瑞洛在 75 岁以上老年患者中的出血风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027398.