Suppr超能文献

多层次单词准确性综合量表:一种评估儿童言语失用症言语产出的新方法。

The Multilevel Word Accuracy Composite Scale: A Novel Measure of Speech Production in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.

Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Aug 17;32(4S):1866-1883. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00166. Epub 2023 May 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Multilevel word Accuracy Composite Scale (MACS) is a novel whole-word measure of speech production accuracy designed to evaluate behaviors commonly targeted in motor-based intervention for childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). The MACS yields a composite score generated through ratings of and . This study examined the validity of the MACS through comparison to established measures of speech accuracy. Reliability was also examined within and between practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs).

METHOD

The MACS was used to rate 117 tokens produced by children with severe CAS. Ratings were performed in the laboratory setting by two expert raters and by practicing SLPs ( = 19). Concurrent validity was estimated through comparison of expert MACS ratings (i.e., MACS score and each component rating) to measures of speech accuracy (percent phoneme correct and the 3-point scale) using correlational analyses. Reliability was examined between expert raters and across SLP raters using the intraclass correlation coefficient to examine interrater reliability of expert ratings, in addition to inter- and intrarater reliability of SLP ratings.

RESULTS

Correlation analyses between MACS ratings (i.e., MACS score and component ratings) and existing measures of speech accuracy revealed small to large positive correlations between measures. Reliability analyses revealed moderate to excellent reliability for MACS ratings performed by expert raters and between (interrater) and within (intrarater) SLP raters.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of concurrent validity indicate that the MACS aligns with established measures, yet contributes novel elements for rating speech accuracy. Results further support the MACS as a reliable measure for rating speech accuracy in children with severe speech impairment for ratings performed by expert raters and practicing clinicians.

摘要

目的

多水平单词准确性综合量表(MACS)是一种新颖的全词言语产生准确性测量工具,旨在评估儿童言语运动障碍(CAS)的基于运动的干预中常见的行为。MACS 通过 和 的评分来生成综合评分。本研究通过与现有的言语准确性测量工具进行比较来检验 MACS 的有效性。还在练习言语语言病理学家(SLP)内部和之间检查了可靠性。

方法

使用 MACS 对 117 个由严重 CAS 儿童产生的音位进行评分。评分由两位专家评估者和 19 名练习 SLP 在实验室环境中进行。通过相关分析,通过比较专家 MACS 评分(即 MACS 得分和每个组成部分的评分)与言语准确性测量(音位百分比正确和 3 分制)来估计并行效度。使用组内相关系数检查专家评分之间的可靠性以及 SLP 评分之间的可靠性,以检查专家评分的组内可靠性,以及 SLP 评分的组内和组间可靠性。

结果

MACS 评分(即 MACS 得分和组成部分评分)与现有的言语准确性测量之间的相关分析显示,两种测量之间存在小到中等的正相关。可靠性分析显示,专家评估者和(组间)和(组内)SLP 评估者之间的 MACS 评分具有中等至极好的可靠性。

结论

并行效度分析表明,MACS 与现有的测量工具一致,但为言语准确性评分提供了新的元素。结果进一步支持 MACS 作为一种可靠的工具,用于评估严重言语障碍儿童的言语准确性,适用于专家评估者和练习临床医生的评估。

相似文献

1
The Multilevel Word Accuracy Composite Scale: A Novel Measure of Speech Production in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Aug 17;32(4S):1866-1883. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00166. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):419-430. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00381. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Intra- and Interjudge Reliability of the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale in Early Stroke Patients.
J Commun Disord. 2021 Jan-Feb;89:106076. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106076. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Assessing speech intelligibility of pathological speech: test types, ratings and transcription measures.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Jan 2;37(1):52-76. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.2009918. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Naive Listener Ratings of Speech Intelligibility Over the Course of Motor-Based Intervention in Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 26;67(9S):3377-3391. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00656. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD006278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub3.
9
Reliability of Perceptual Judgments of Phonetic Accuracy and Hypernasality Among Speech-Language Pathologists for Children With Dysarthria.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1558-1571. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00144. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
The Reliability of Expert Diagnosis of Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 26;67(9S):3309-3326. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00677. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Graduate Student Clinicians' Perceptions of Child Speech Sound Errors.
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022 Aug;7(4):1275-1283. doi: 10.1044/2022_persp-21-00332. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
4
Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Apr 11;53(2):256-274. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):419-430. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00381. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Making the case for the collection of a minimal dataset for children with speech sound disorder.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Sep;56(5):1097-1107. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12649. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
A Framework of Motoric Complexity: An Investigation in Children With Typical and Impaired Speech Development.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Oct 16;63(10):3326-3348. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial.
Pediatr Res. 2021 Feb;89(3):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Using Crowdsourced Listeners' Ratings to Measure Speech Changes in Hypokinetic Dysarthria: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 May 8;29(2):873-882. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00162. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验